Return to “Pink Slime” Journalism: AI Scraping Edition

Last fall I had a post about the phenomenon known as “pink slime” journalism. Basically it’s where websites churn out content using either low-paid writers or generative AI. The “news” is either low-quality scrapings from legitimate sites or paid political propaganda. With the continued rise of AI, more and more sites are producing pink slime content to generate advertising revenue. The following is an update I added to the main post on pink slime.

Pink slime journalism sites have not gone away in the months since I first wrote about them. In fact, AI-powered pink slime sites continue to grow, infesting people’s news diet. (If you need a refresher, “pink slime,” in addition to being used to describe “finely chopped beef” trimmings,  has more recently been used to describe automated websites that publish poor-quality news stories and political propaganda while pretending to be high-quality local news sites.)

Nieman Lab ran a big story in January of 2025 about a network of AI-generated newsletters that operate as Good Day News. The AI-engine scans everything it can find about the community and turns it into brief, positive stories. In essence, Good Day takes the work done by local newspapers, radio stations, TV stations, and independent digital outlets  It then repackages the information and sells advertising to go with it.

The newsletters have testimonials that go with them. Local news publishers say the endorsements are fabricated. The publisher of the newsletters denies this, saying the names “anonymized” and the quotes “sanitized amalgamations of some of our favorite (and most common) testimonials.”

(Hmmm… I know what I would say to a student who made those statements.)

I highly recommend reading Andrew Deck’s story and would argue that this is a perfect example of pink slime journalism, even though Deck does not use the term.


Have you encountered pink slime sites? Leave a comment below!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Social Media Change 2025 Part 3: TikTok – The Hate/Love relationship

Social media are going through some big changes this winter. Meta/Facebook has changed its policies banning hate speech and deceptive information on its platforms; TikTok was facing a ban, shut itself down, and then came back with the blessings of he new US president; and niche Twitter replacement Bluesky has exploded in popularity.

Today we will look at the changing fortunes of the hugely popular Chinese-owned video sharing service TikTok.


So the Chinese-owned video sharing service TikTok is the social media channel young people love and that congress, state governments, and other politicians hate/love/rinse/repeat.

Why do young people love TikTok? Here’s a video illustrating some of the most popular videos from the service in 2024.

Why do federal and state politicians want to ban it?

At the core of these attempts is that TikTok is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance. The biggest worry about TikTok is the level of information it collects about users, such as your IP address and physical location while using it. TikTok also wants you to give it access to the contacts on your phone (i.e., your lists of phone numbers and e-mail addresses). When combined with location data, this could then be used to extrapolate whom you are meeting with or talking to. Your messages on the app can be read by the company, and your viewing history is open to them as well. Is this different from any other social media company? Nope. But other social media companies don’t have direct ties to the Chinese government, either. Another major concern is that China might use the social media channel for propaganda.

During President Trump’s first term of office, he signed an executive order banning TikTok in the United States, but the ban never went into effect when American tech company Oracle contracted to host of TikTok’s US data, though TikTok would still be owned by the Chinese company ByteDance.

Then in 2024, a strongly bipartisan bill was signed into law by President Biden banning TikTok from doing business in the United States unless ByteDance sold it. How bipartisan was the bill? It passed the House by a 352-65 vote (D 155/50/8; R 197/15/7).  The Senate then passed the ban as part of a larger bill including aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Gaza, by a vote of 79-18 (D 46/2/0; R 31/15/3; I 2/1/0).  As can be seen, the vote in favor of the ban was overwhelming.

But there has not a lot of popular support for banning TikTok outside of state legislatures and Congress. A Pew Research study in December 2023 found only 38% of U.S. adults said they would support a government ban of TikTok, down from 50% earlier in the year. People who use TikTok are even more likely to oppose banning it, reaching only 16% support.

ByteDance went to the US Supreme Court to keep the ban from going into effect arguing that it would violate both the company’s free speech rights as well as those of its users. The court, in an unsigned opinion with no dissents, rejected the free speech challenge, allowing the ban to go into effect on Sunday, January 19, 2025, the day before President Trump would be inaugurated for his second term. In response, ByteDance took TikTok dark in the US on Saturday evening, even though the Biden administration said they would not enforce the ban.

"Sorry, TikTok isn't available right now. "A law banning TikTok has been enacted in the U.S. Unfortunately, that means you can't use TikTok for now. We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate TikTok once he takes office. Please stay tuned!"

By Sunday afternoon, TikTok was more or less back with the promise of an executive order from President Trump extending the deadline for the sale of the company. While all seemed to be happy with TikTok, many of their American service providers were not as sanguine about violating a federal law that had large fines in it.

Amazon Web Services was not providing hosting, while both Apple and Google had taken down the app from their stores. TikTokers who had deleted the app from their phones found that they could not reinstall it after the Sunday deadline has passed. According to the Washington Post, both Apple and Google have long-standing policies to for follow the laws of the countries they operate in. Apple’s tech support website had a message up dated Jan. 27, 2025 stating that they would provide neither the app nor updates to it until the legal position of the company changed.

Why did President Trump go from supporting a TikTok ban to opposing it?

It can be hard to tell, but the change happened after he met with his wealthy donor hedge fund manager Jeff Yass in March of 2024. ABC News reports that Yass has opposed anti-TikTok efforts, supporting freedom to pick between whatever apps people want to. Yass also has a “significant stake” in ByteDance, according to the Wall Street Journal. In addition, Trump has also said that banning TikTok would only help Meta/Facebook, whom he dislikes: “I don’t want Facebook… doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!”  Also, by the end of 2024, President Trump had more than 14 million followers on TikTok he was reportedly reluctant to give up.

He also discussed his change of heart during a press conference early in 2025. We’ll close out with that.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Social Media Change 2025 Part 2: Breaking Up With Meta

Social media are going through some big changes this winter. Meta/Facebook has changed its policies banning hate speech and deceptive information on its platforms; TikTok was facing a ban, shut itself down, and then came back with the blessings of he new US president; and niche Twitter replacement Bluesky has exploded in popularity.

Dr. Jeremy Littau

Dr. Jeremy Littau

For Part 2 of this series, my friend Dr. Jeremy Littau discusses in a guest post why he is gradually breaking up with the Meta social media and moving on to different channels. (This article was originally posted on both Facebook and Dr. Littau’s Substack.

Dr. Littau is a journalism professor at Lehigh University who came to national attention back in 2019 when he posted a tweet storm of 30 or so posts that outlined an argument for why news media layoffs keep happening. Within three days, the thread had nearly 7 million impressions, 187,000 engagements, 18,000 retweets, and more than 1,200 replies.


Information Resiliency
By Dr. Jeremy Littau

During inauguration week, I logged off to all Meta products to protest the company’s rollback of trust and safety standards. The company, frankly, has taken a dark turn in the new year and no longer will be quality-assuring the community it enables. It’s weird, because their business is community and this type of content destabilizes the connections needed to build healthy communities. You’d think they would know this by now.

After the week was over, I realized I am not done and didn’t miss being online that much. So I have begun divesting myself from Meta. I think this is a company that is worth denying our attention. My Threads and Instagram are now deleted, and my Facebook will be deleted during the next week. I am trying to work through messaging alternatives; WhatsApp and Messenger are a thornier problem but one I intend to solve.

I will try not to sermonize, but make plain my own ethical reasoning. Meta is a company that has decided to stop policing hate speech and has placed bets on potential profit gains to be had by supporting the Trump administration despite our president’s war on our most vulnerable. This has rhymes in history; there are examples from the 1930s and ’40s of media moguls and companies cozying up to the very fascists we fought in WWII, companies that in pursuit of profits became mouthpieces for propaganda that justified great evil.

The consequences for these decisions are all Meta’s problem, of course. But while we cannot change these systems on our own, we do have an ethical duty to use what power we do have to change systems of harm. To that end, it’s important to realize our power is in our attention. Engagement with Meta’s products fuels ad dollars is how the company makes money, and to deny them our attention is power because it affects their bottom line. We can, in other words, live out our values by virtue of what we regard, knowing that regard affects Meta’s bottom line. We can collectively grab their attention by individually exercising our choice.

No shame on anyone who feels like they have to stay. I get it. Our social relationships are locked in, and I don’t relish the possibility of leaving behind dear friends I only connect with on Facebook. I would ask us to consider the costs of a malevolent corporation owning the map to our social connections and whether we ought to build differently. Regardless of your political views, we can probably agree at least that we should own the map to our own social relationships.

But this isn’t just about leaving. To that end, I strongly recommend you start to invest in decentralized media that is architecturally designed to let you own your own social relationships and posting data, and that by design keeps companies from making us feel trapped. Leave behind centralized products that consolidate their power by owning your address book. Being trapped is the method of abusers.

Information resilience is my watchword for 2025; it’s time for us to own the communication lines that will bring us strength through the trials and horrors to come. If I have a media prediction for the coming year, it’s that companies that are premised on the idea of locking you in are going to suffer as users begin to realize their attention is power and seek resilient lines of communication that can withstand the whims of an unaccountable billionaire. This, again, has echoes in history. During times of oppression and autocracy, regular people take control of their communication lines and reorient them to work better in terms of privacy, information quality, and rethinking who you can trust in times of trouble.

As I have written before, I’m on one decentralized product, Bluesky, that uses a decentralized protocol that can be run on any platform and let you connect with people cross-platform if their platform of choice uses the same protocol. This is a principle known as interoperability, which gives power to users by letting them build a network that isn’t dependent on being on a particular platform, similar to having someone’s email address. Bluesky users (you can follow me here) then can migrate from that platform to any other platform that uses the underlying ATProtocol software and take their follows/followers (i.e. their address book) with them if they don’t like the way a particular platform is operating. Nobody owns the communication language that makes interoperability possible, and thus they do not own you.

I also am on Signal, a secure end-to-end encrypted messaging service built on open source technology. I’m actively looking at other types of products for audio and video that do similar things. Resilience is something we have to actively build, and right now the times call for it.

And not Meta-related, but one project for the first half of this year will be to migrate this newsletter off of Substack because of this service’s same decisions about content moderation.

Elon Musk has singlehandedly wrecked Twitter and sent it spiraling. Meta is doing it to itself next. I say burn it all down and rebuild with decentralization in mind.


Jeremy Littau is an associate professor of journalism and communication at Lehigh University. Find him on Bluesky for short-form commentary and analysis about digital media and society.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Social Media Change 2025 Part 1: Meta Content Moderation

Social media are going through some big changes this winter. Meta/Facebook has changed its policies banning hate speech and deceptive information on its platforms; TikTok was facing a ban, shut itself down, and then came back with the blessings of he new US president; and niche Twitter replacement Bluesky has exploded in popularity.

This post looking at how Meta is changing content moderation is the first in a series looking at how social media is changing during the start of the second Trump presidency. 


On January 7, 2025, Meta announced that it would no longer be using third-party fact checking on its social media sites, which include Facebook, Threads and Instagram. Joel Kaplan, Meta’s chief global affairs officer, wrote in a blog post at about.fb.com that Meta’s sites need to be places “where people can express themselves freely. That can be messy.” Kaplan goes on to write that Meta’s systems got increasingly complex and seemed to be going too far, putting people in “Facebook jail” for inoffensive materials and for exhibiting “bias.”

Meta is now transitioning to a system of “Community Notes” similar to that used by Elon Musk’s X/Twitter. Instead of having experts moderating content, users of the sites will take care of labeling what they find problematic.

Video report on the change from ABC News

Not surprisingly, this has generated a lot of controversy. Here are several stories from reliable media dealing this these issues:

  • NPR – What will the fallout be of Meta eliminating fact checking?
    Several NPR reporters talk with All Things Considered host Scott Detrow about what the long-term fall out will be from this change. There is both a transcript and an audio recording of the story.
  • Washington Post – Finding truth on social media
    The WaPo is kind of going out on a limb here, assuming that truth can be found these days on social media. But at any rate, a tech reporter Heather Kelly has several suggestions on how to find reliable information through social media. She actually has several good suggestions including:

    • Don’t trust your gut.
    • Don’t use AI.
    • Don’t assume things were factual before.
    • Be ready for more controversial posts.
    • Avoid algorithmic feeds that send you stories you already agree with.
    • Look elsewhere for truth.
  • NY Times – What does ending fact checking accomplish, beyond making the new president happy?
    The Times takes an extended look at what this means, including:

    • How FB founder Mark Zuckerberg’s politics have changed since 2016.
    • What this means for harassment of LGBTQ community.
    • What this means for the spread of disinformation.
    • Was there really a problem with fact checking? Or just a problem with misinformation being called out?

And finally,


Coming up next: Making the break from Meta

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Social Media Change 2025 Part 1: Meta Content Moderation

MLK’s Great Question – “Will we be extremists for hate or love?”

m" One of the greatest honors of my life was being invited to speak at the Martin Luther King, Jr. candlelight vigil several years ago at the UNK student union, along with KevinThe question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice?... The nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr National Museum of African American History & Culture

One of the greatest honors of my life was being invited to speak at the Martin Luther King, Jr. candlelight vigil several years ago at the UNK student union, along with Kevin Chaney, who was then UNK’s women’s basketball coach. 

On today of all days we must reject hate and embrace love.

Here’s what I had to say about Dr. King when I spoke:

Visalli-11-10-13When we think of public relations, we think of a professional in a suit trying to persuade us about something related to a large corporation. But not all PR is practiced by big business.

Civil rights leader The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had a brilliant understanding of public relations during the campaign to desegregate Birmingham, Alabama in 1963.

The goal of the campaign was to have non-violent demonstrations and resistance to force segregated businesses to open up to African Americans. What King, and the members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, wanted to do was stage a highly visible demonstration that would not only force change in Birmingham, but also grab the attention of the entire American public.

King and his colleagues picked Birmingham because it was one of he most segregated cities in America and because it had Eugene “Bull” Conner as police commissioner.

Conner was a racist who could be counted on to attack the peaceful marchers. Birmingham was a city where black protestors were thrown in jail, and the racists were bombing homes and churches. There was a black neighborhood that had so many bombings it came to be known as Dynamite Hill.

Dr. King and his colleagues had planned demonstrations and boycotts in Birmingham, but held off with them in order to let the political system and negotiations work. But time passed, and nothing changed. Signs were still up at the lunch counters and water fountains, and protestors were still headed to jail.

King and the rest of the SCLC needed to get attention for the plight of African Americans in cities like Birmingham.

They needed to do more than fight back against the racism of segregation. They needed to get Americans of good will in all the churches and synagogues to hear their voices.

Starting in April of 1963, predominantly African American volunteers would march in the streets, hold sit-ins at segregated lunch counters, and boycott local businesses in Birmingham. As the protests started, so did the arrests.

On Good Friday, King and Abernathy joined in the marching so that they would be arrested. While King was in jail, he was given a copy of the Birmingham News, in which there was an article where white Alabama clergy urged the SCLC to stop the demonstrations and boycotts and allow the courts to solve the problem of segregation.

But King was tired of waiting, and so he wrote what would become one of the great statements of the civil rights cause. One that spoke to people who were fundamentally their friends, not their enemies. This came to be known as the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.

Writing the letter was not easy. Dr. King wrote it in the margins of the newspaper. He wrote it on scraps of note paper. He wrote it on panels of toilet paper. (Think about what the toilet paper was like if Dr. King was able to write on it!)

The letter spoke to the moderates who were urging restraint. To them, he wrote:

“My Dear Fellow Clergymen:

While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and untimely.” Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas…. But since I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try to answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms.”

He went on the acknowledge that perhaps he was an extremist, but that he was an extremist for love, not for hate:

“But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label.

Was not Jesus an extremist for love: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.”

Was not Amos an extremist for justice: “Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream.” …

Was not Martin Luther an extremist: “Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God.” …

And Abraham Lincoln: “This nation cannot survive half slave and half free.”

And Thomas Jefferson: “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal . . .”

So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love?”

King’s jailhouse writings were smuggled out and published as a brochure. His eloquent words were given added force for being written in jail. As he says toward the end of his letter, it is very different to send a message from jail than from a hotel room:

“Never before have I written so long a letter. I’m afraid it is much too long to take your precious time. I can assure you that it would have been much shorter if I had been writing from a comfortable desk, but what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell, other than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers?”

Once King was released from jail eight days later, he and his followers raised the stakes. No longer would adults be marching and being arrested, children would become the vanguard. And as the children marched, photographers and reporters from around the world would document these young people being attacked by dogs, battered by water from fire hoses, and filling up the Birmingham jails.

King faced criticism for allowing the young people to face the dangers of marching in Birmingham. But he responded by criticizing the white press, asking the reporters where they had been “during the centuries when our segregated social system had been misusing and abusing Negro children.”

Although there was rioting in Birmingham, and King’s brother’s house was bombed, the campaign was ultimately successful. Business owners took down the signs that said “WHITE” and “COLORED” from the drinking fountains and bathrooms, and anyone was allowed to eat at the lunch counters. The successful protest in Birmingham set the stage for the March on Washington that would take place in August of 1963, where King would give his famous “I have a dream” speech.

We are now more than sixtyy years from King’s letter from Birmingham Jail. This letter was not one of his “feel good” speeches. It doesn’t raise the spirit the way his “I have a dream” speech did.

But it did give us a message that still matters more than ever today:

 “I hope this letter finds you strong in the faith. I also hope that circumstances will soon make it possible for me to meet each of you, not as an integrationist or a civil-rights leader but as a fellow clergyman and a Christian brother. Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear drenched communities, and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all their scintillating beauty.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on MLK’s Great Question – “Will we be extremists for hate or love?”

And so the Ninth Edition is in print…

Cover of the ninth edition of Mass Communication: Living in a Media World.Just got my author’s copies of the ninth edition of my media literacy textbook Mass Communication: Living in a Media World. So excited to see these years of work in print! For those of you teaching with Mass Communication, it is available for review now and for adoption starting this summer.

It’s amazing to think back on how different things were back in the spring and summer 2020 when I was finishing up the eighth edition. We were still in the midst of the global pandemic lockdown and all the lasting effects the lockdown had on the media industry. Sports teams stopped playing, movies and television shows stopped being produced, theaters were closed, music was being recorded at home or through complex online links, and everyone was just staying home to consume their media.

  • Now, 4 years later, we are dealing with the aftermath of how the media industry and media consumers have emerged from that time.
    Young, and not-so-young, folks are busy engaging with all things Taylor Swift. It seems impossible to listen to music, watch television, go on social media, watch football… without encountering the megastar.
  • The movie industry is trying to figure out how to bring people back into theaters in great enough numbers to keep cinemas open. Coming in on top of all the holdups from the pandemic and people getting used to viewing at home, movies (and television) are dealing with the aftermath of lengthy writers’ and actors’ strikes over the last year.
  • American culture is also dealing with a lot of new or revived fears about the media. There have been unprecedented efforts to ban books about race and sexuality from libraries and public schools, and parents are worrying about how social media are affecting teens, especially young women.
  • There are intense concerns as to whether the local news industry can survive the steep decline in community newspapers.

And yet, through all of this there are new voices being heard through streaming services and other long-tail media. Independent bookstores are finding fresh relevance as people turn to people, rather than algorithms, for advice on what to read, and millions of people are discovering the joy of the minimally produced NPR Tiny Desk concerts on YouTube.

The COVID-19 pandemic may not be over, but both the media industry and media consumers are trying to find their way to a new normal, and that’s what this ninth edition of Mass Communication: Living in a Media World explores.

Thank you to all the wonderful editors, artists, and freelancers at Sage for helping bring this new edition to fruition. It’s been a long, but satisfying, trip.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on And so the Ninth Edition is in print…

Something Old, Something New: Favorite Movies From 2024

Over the last year, I and/or my Dear Wife have watched 107 movies; some that were new releases (i.e Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga), some that were vintage or classics (i.e. Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison), and some that were repeat viewings of old favorites (i.e. Rogue One).

Here are my 10 favorite movies I saw for the first time in 2024. This is in no way a 10-best list, particularly since more than half of them were originally released before this year, sometimes long before (the oldest is from 1948). They are just the 10 movies I enjoyed the most that I hadn’t seen before. They are presented in the order in which I watched them, followed by a list of honorable mentions.

What movies would you put on your list of favorites?


  • The Holdovers (2023) – Director Alexander Payne’s wonderful Christmas-adjacent movie starring Paul Giamatti, Da’Vine Joy Randolph, and Dominic Sessa. Randolph won a well-deserved Oscar for best supporting actress for playing the the school’s cook who is the bereaved mother of a young Vietnam soldier. The Holdovers tells the story of a misfit classics professor (Giamatti) who has to look after a small group of prep school students who have no place to go over the holidays, and the staff cook who lives at the school. It is a bittersweet story of how three characters come to terms with the circumstances life has given them. (Viewed at The World Theatre, Kearney. Available for streaming on Amazon Prime.)

  • Rustin (2023) – One of the neglected dirty secrets of the 1950s & 60s civil rights movement was that it could have a distinctly homophobic aspect to it. And because of that, the story of how openly gay Bayard Rustin, a close adviser of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., played a key role in organizing the 1963 March on Washington where Dr. King gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech, has been sadly neglected.This film, produced by Barack and Michelle Obama, helps bring Rustin’s story the attention it deserves.  Colman Domingo leads the cast as the activist Rustin, accompanied by Aml Ameen as Dr. King; Chris Rock doing a dramatic turn as Roy Wilkins, the president of the NAACP; and Jeffrey Wright as the U.S. Representative for Harlem, Adam Clayton Powell Jr. (We’ll see Wright show up again in a another of my favorites for 2024). (Viewed at The World Theatre, Kearney. Available for streaming on Netflix.)

  • Anatomy of a Fall movie poster.Anatomy of a Fall (2023) – A French murder mystery, with dialog in French and English, is a trial drama with actress Sandra Hüller playing a writer trying to prove her innocence in the death of her writer husband at a chalet in the French mountains. The less I say about this movie, the better, except to note that things are rarely entirely what they seem. The rare whodunit where the identity of the murderer may not be the most important question the movie will (or will not) answer.Anatomy of a Fall won the Oscar for best original screenplay.  Hüller will also show up in one of my honorable mention films, The Zone of Interest. (Viewed at The World Theatre, Kearney. Available for streaming on Hulu.)
  • Dune: Part 2 movie posterDune: Part 2 (2024) – The one big-budget blockbuster on my list of favorites this year. I was fortunate to see the second half of Denis Villeneuve’s epic presentation of Frank Herbert’s environmental science fiction epic at an IMAX theater near where my 97-year-old father lives in the Twin Cities.There have been multiple attempts to adapt Herbert’s sprawling, psychedelic book for the theater or television, and none of them prior to Villeneuve’s have been particularly successful (though David Lynch’s 1984 version was a fascinating misfire). Villeneuve took much the same approach as Peter Jackson did with The Lord of the Rings, staying true to the overall narrative but making significant changes to make the story filmable.  Watch it at home, but go see it in the theater if you ever get the chance during a re-release (Viewed at the AMC IMAX, Roseville, MN. Available for streaming on MAX.)
  • American Fiction (2023) – The second movie starring Jeffrey Wright on my Top 10 list for 2024 (even though both of them came out in 2023). Wright plays a frustrated college professor/author whose books get miscatagorized as “African American Fiction”  instead of as the correct “Mythology.” As an act of satire and defiance, Wright’s character creates a prison novel with every blaxploitation cliché under the pseudonym “Stagg R. Leigh.” He then insists that it be published under the unpublishable title of “F@#&,” except using the real word. To his horror, the book becomes a bestseller and Leigh and instant celebrity.Alternately laugh-out-loud funny and thought provoking, this is the perfect movie for a time when we pretend to talk about Critical Race Theory, wonder what is happening to publishing, and think about what is happening to our universities. Director Cord Jefferson won the Oscar for best adapted screenplay. (Viewed at The World Theatre, Kearney. Available for streaming on Amazon Prime.)

  • Hundreds of Beavers (2022/2024) – If this were a Ten Best list, should I ever have had to hubris to creates such a thing, Hundreds of Beavers would emphatically not be on it. But this black & white live action homage to the classic Looney Tunes battles among Elmer Fudd, Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck has to be some of the most fun I’ve had in a theater for a long time. It is almost impossible to describe, so I will keep it simple. It tells the story of a mighty trapper trying to tap enough beavers in the frozen north so that he has the money to marry his sweetheart. All of the beavers, bunnies and other animals are played by actors in mascot costumes. Yes, it is as silly as it sounds. And you want to see it. (Viewed at The World Theatre, Kearney. Available for streaming on Amazon Prime and multiple other services.)

  • Wicked Little Letters (2023) – This is a nasty little treat of a black comedy staring Olivia Colman that tells the true story of an investigation of a set of crude, rude and socially unacceptable letters sent out to residents of the small British town of Littlehampton in the early 1920s. As is generally the case with such movies, the story is heavily fictionalized but has a solid core of reality.One of the The Seven Secrets About the Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know is “All Media Are Social,” and this movie is all about how media (in this case, private letters) are emphatically social. Olivia Colman and Jessie Buckley are a hoot as the antagonists over the long series of nasty letters. (Viewed at The World Theatre, Kearney. Available for streaming on Netflix.)Warning: The Red Band trailer below is definitely R-rated with profane language. Not for the children…

  • The Big Combo (1955) – One of the great film noirs that demonstrated how dark, daring, sexy movies could get made despite all of the limitations of the Code Era. The movie stars Cornel Wilde, Richard Conte and Brian Donlevy, along wtih Jean Wallace. No spoilers here, but it has one of the most explicit unseen scenes of any movie made under the Production Code. It shows up once or twice a year on Turner Classic Movies (which is where I saw it). But since it was not properly copyrighted, it is in the public domain, so you can watch the whole the whole thing on YouTube.

  • Poster for Heaven Knows, Mr. AllisonHeaven Knows, Mr. Allison (1957) – There are a number of movies out there telling the story of a tough guy/sailor stranded on an island during The War and finding the only other adult there to be a nun/teacher/otherwise-unavailable woman. (See Cary Grant and Leslie Caron in 1964’s Father Goose as an example.) Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison is an exceptional outing in the genre, starring Robert Mitchum and Deborah Kerr as the leads. The screenplay got an Oscar nomination, as did Kerr.The movie itself doesn’t do anything special other than provide a fantastic canvas for these two actors to show how war and isolation can transform people. I saw it on Turner Classic Movies, but it can also be rented/purchased through Amazon.
  • The Wild Robot (2024) – A shoe-in for a nomination for best feature-length animated film, and if Pixar’s Inside Out 2 were not the animated feature box office champ, it ought to be in the running to win. But nothing will stop the Pixar juggernaut. It’s the sweet story of a misplaced robot having to care for an abandoned young goose. Likely the last in-house produced animation from Dream Works, it stars the vocal talents of Lupita Nyong’o, Pedro Pascal, Kit Connor, Bill Nighy, Stephanie Hsu, Mark Hamill, Catherine O’Hara and Ving Rhames. I defy you to show me another animated film with such a banger voice cast. If you can possibly find a way to still see it in the theater, please do so.  I saw it at my local Golden Ticket commercial theater, and I’m hoping The World here in Kearney will get it this spring.


Ralph’s Honorable Mention Films 

Along with the above list, here are several additional movies I really enjoyed in 2024.

  • Les Miserabes (2012) – Dear Wife and I were supposed to see the play in Lincoln last winter, but we were blocked from traveling by snow and bitter cold. So when we saw it was playing at the Council Bluffs’ AMC for a revival screening, we went. Wonderful to see on the big screen, and that’s where we saw trailers for Wicked Little Letters and The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare.
  • The Zone of Interest ( 2023) – The banality of evil through the eyes of the family of the superintendent of Auschwitz . Winner of Oscars for best international feature film and best sound. (And a nominee for best picture, director and adapted screenplay.) Needless to say, not the feel-good movie of the year…
  • Civil War (2024) – More a journalism/war correspondent film than a war film. Kirsten Dunst plays a modern war photographer who echos WWII photographer Lee Miller (subject of the 2023 movie Lee that I hope to see early in 2024).
  • Furiosa – A Mad Max Saga (2024)  – I was underwhelmed by this prequel to Mad Max Fury Road when I saw it at the IMAX, but I suspect that’s in large part because it is unfair to compare it to Fury Road, one of the best action/chase films ever made. I need to see it again.
  • Call Northside 777 (1948) – The oldest of the films on my list this year, it stars Jimmy Stewart as a Chicago newspaper reporter trying to clear the record of the wrongfully convicted murder suspect played by Richard Conte (who played the very guilty gangster in The Big Combo). An excellent example of the docu-noir genre.
  • Lincoln (2012) – Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln, dealing with the Civil War president’s efforts to free the enslaved people, was the the second 2012 film that I first saw in 2024. It was nominated for a dozen academy awards, winning best actor for Daniel Day-Lewis and best production design. Despite sounding like a seriously “good-for-you” movie, it was tremendously entertaining when I got to see it at a World Theatre screening.
  • The Best Christmas Pageant Ever (2024) – A fresh faith-based Christmas movie that manages to tell a heart-tugging story without getting all heavy handed as such films can tend to be. Based on the 1972 novel of the same name, it tells the story of six out-of-control, nearly feral children who take over a church’s Christmas pageant. When it was screened it at our local community theatre, it sold out all three showings.
  • Klaus (2019) – I cannot for the life of me understand why Klaus has not taken on the classic status of such animated Christmas movies as the Benedict Cumberbatch version of The Grinch. A fantastic non-standard Santa origin story.
  • The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare (2024) – Guy Ritchie’s highly creative take on the true story of Operation Postmaster, the first mission of the the British WWII Special Operations Executive. Ian Fleming is a minor character in the film, and he used the leader of the raid, Major Gus March-Phillipps, as the inspiration for his James Bond series of novels. The book by historian Damien Lewis gives the full, unfictionalized vision of this incredible group of commandos and is well worth the read.

And one last movie from New Year’s Eve: The Six Triple Eight (2024) – One more little-told story from World War II about the Black women of the 6888 battalion, the only all-black female unit to serve in Europe. These women solved the mail-delivery-to-the-troops-fighting-in-Europe problem that no one else could or would tackle. Yes, it is a sentimental Tyler Perry film, but it tells an important story of hope at a time when we really need it. Currently streaming on Netflix. (Also, a prime example of why we need people other than just white males making movies!)


Those were my favorite movies first seen in 2024. What were yours?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Something Old, Something New: Favorite Movies From 2024

Why is the NY Times Connections the most controversial online game?

When you are on Facebook, if you see the following graphic with some kind of comment below, you know that one of your friends has succumbed to the addiction that is the NY Times game – Connections.

Social media graphic that shows your success (or lack thereof) for the day with the online Connections game. For the unfamiliar, guessing one of each color means you had one word from each of the four separate categories in your guess, showing that you had the ultimate wrong answer. Clicking on the image will take you to the current game board.

The game is both deceptively simple and insanely complex. Each day, the Connections puzzle displays a 4×4 grid of 16 words (or occasionally symbols). The player is charged with putting the 16 words into four separate categories exhibiting some kind of similarity (or connection) that binds each set of four words together,  rated from easy (yellow) to very hard (purple).

Here is an example board from a year ago. Clicking on it will take you to an article from KSAT News about the game.

The game has a passionate following from millions, including your author and many of my friends. My Dear Wife no longer wants to hear anything I have to say on the subject over our morning coffee. Wyna Liu, the editor of the daily puzzle from The Times, inspires a wide range of responses from players depending on how they feel about the day’s puzzle, including professions of despair and hate.

Recently The Atlantic’s website ran a fascinating interview with Liu in which she talks about how the game’s boards are created, what types of connections the words can have, and how she feels about people’s intense reactions to the game.

There are also tools out there where you can create your own Connections board that will be even more interesting than the official ones. For example, here’s a post-election day one profanity-laced board from from science blogger Hank Green (who is also YA author John Green’s brother).

Are you a Connections junkie? Tell us about it in the comments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Why is the NY Times Connections the most controversial online game?

New algorithms help animators with coiled hair for Black characters

One of the issues that has long been a problem for diversity in entertainment media is that creatives often have not been trained or had the tools to effectively portray people of color.

A new algorithm that can digitally generate coiled hair images has been created by Haomiao Wu, Alvin Shi, A.M. Darke, and Theodore Kim. Image from Yale Engineering.

Which is why it is so exciting to see new tools for effectively animating Afro-textured hair in films. According to computer science professor Dr. Theodore Kim, who has previously worked for Pixar Research,  “If you do a deep dive into the technical literature… you see that all of the supposedly foundational papers on this topic … feature just straight hair.”

Kim tells the WaPo that his colleagues at Pixar often had to put in large amounts of time on manual animation of Black hair because the existing tools couldn’t handle it. (Though the WaPo article doesn’t mention it, Dr. Kim has won two Technical Achievement Academy Awards for his work on computer animation techniques, the first in 2012, the second 10 years later in 2023. Also worth noting that in addition to studying computer science as an undergrad at Cornell University, Dr. Kim also had a concentration in English literature. STEM also needs humanities! )

You will need to read the article to get a handle on what the researchers needed to do to make curly hair work with animation algorithms, but essentially it was moving from a model that used straight lines to a model that dealt with three-dimensional helixes.


Early concept art from Hair Love as seen on Vashti Harrison’s Instagram account.

Learning about Dr. Kim’s work reminded me about one of my all-time favorite short animated films: the Oscar-winning Hair Love. Hair Love was the brainchild of former NFL player Matthew Cherry, who wanted to turn the online trend of viral videos of Black fathers styling their children’s hair into an inspirational (and fun!) animated film that celebrated natural hair. In the short, a Black father is struggling to style his young daughter’s hair before heading out of the house.

If you have any interest in animation and how an animated short can get made outside of the major studios, read the article linked above and watch the complete film below.

Watching the dad’s efforts with his daughter’s hair will help you understand exactly what makes curly hair so challenging for animators. (And yet, the crew for Hair Love, which included Pixar and Sony Animation alums, managed to animate all the hair in the film beautifully.)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on New algorithms help animators with coiled hair for Black characters

Iconic “This is Fine” Dog echos a 14th century illuminated manuscript image

How long has the “This is  Fine” meme been around?

Would you believe the 14th century?

You all know the Dog-in-the-Burning-Room “This Is Fine” meme, right?

Artist KC Green’s comic “On Fire” which has become the omnipresent “This is Fine” meme.

As reported in the LAist blog, Green drew the iconic image as part of his comic Gunshot back in 2012 when he was fighting depression and feeling overwhelmed. The image has since been used uncounted number of times with a variety of texts by groups as diverse as the Republican National Committee and Comedy Central’s The Daily Show. 

While the image of the self-satisfied dog  sitting in a burning room with his coffee is undoubtedly original, it interestingly enough echos an illustration from a 14th century illuminated manuscript.

British King Vortigern had a “This is Fine” vibe in an ilustration from a 14th century illuminated manuscript.

As C. Keith Hansley wrote back in 2020 for The Historian’s Hut:

This illustration, from a 14th-century manuscript (labeled BL Royal 20 A II, f. 3 in The British Library) depicts a scene from British legend. Atop the burning castle is Vortigern, a legendary figure from the 5th century who is credited with inviting Saxons into Britain, setting in motion the eventual Anglo-Saxon domination of England that would last for centuries… This scene of Vortigern being besieged and ultimately dying in an inferno set by his enemies is what is depicted in the manuscript illustration featured above.

Thanks to Sarah Cardin on Threads for pointing out the rhyming imagery here. How often do we get to look at an example of Media Secret 4 – Nothing’s new: Everything that happens in the past will happen again with examples from one of our earliest media, hand copied books, rhyming with our most recent social media?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Iconic “This is Fine” Dog echos a 14th century illuminated manuscript image