There’s been a long debate in the United States whether still, movie or television cameras belong in the courtrooms. TV cameras have become a common feature in many local, state, and appellate courts, but as of this writing, the Supreme Court has said an emphatic “no” to cameras of any sort covering their proceedings. Here are links to several articles on cameras in the courtrooms:
- The Hill – It is time for cameras in the courtroom
An op/ed piece arguing for cameras in the supreme court by congressman Gerald E. Connolly of Virginia, who has sponsored bipartisan legislation to expand the use of cameras in the courtroom. - 5 NBC Chicago – Judges Enthusiastic About Cameras in the Courtroom
Illinois has experimented with cameras in its courtrooms, and judges report being largely pleased with their presence. - Associated Press – Minnesota tests cameras in the courtroom
Like Illinois, Minnesota has been experimenting with cameras in the courtroom. While some people expressed concern about how the cameras might affect witness behavior, judges there reported no negative effects. - Legal Times – Judges, Attorneys Debate Cameras in the Courtroom
Interesting coverage of a debate held in the District of Columbia over the role of cameras in the courtroom, especially in the U.S. Supreme Court.