Questions Worth Asking (Maybe)

Women's Olympic skating finals 2022

  • Why has ViacomCBS changed its name to Paramount?
    The simple answer is, “Why not? Everyone knows who Paramount is.” The more complex answer is: Given that most of my media literacy students have never heard of Viacom before enrolling in my class, it’s no surprise that the broadcast/cable/movie giant is taking on Paramount as its brand name.Viacom got its start as a production company run by CBS back in the 1960s, but the broadcast company was forced to spin Viacom off in 1971 because it was too much power in the hand of one company (isn’t that quaint!). Viacom was then bought in 1987 by movie theater owner Sumner Redstone, who added Paramount Studios to his portfolio. And then, given the big changes in the FCC’s feelings about ownership, Viacom bought out CBS. They danced around having separate stock for several years, and then, in 2019, following an extended and rather ugly battle among management and members of the Redstone family, the two companies came back together with the rather awkward name ViacomCBS. So the new name not only makes the company more identifiable, it also helps put the internal battles for control of the company into the past.
  • Why did Sarah Palin lose her libel suit against the NY Times?
    Courtroom illustration of Sarah Palin.The simple answer is that Palin never had a case. The more complex answer is that both the judge and the jury ruled that the former Alaska governor and Republican vice presidential candidate had not demonstrated the high legal status of “actual malice” that public figures are required to meet. The NY Times did print a false statement in an editorial that was relatively quickly corrected. And Palin was unable to show that she had really been harmed by the quickly corrected error.

And finally…

  • Has there ever been a more perfect hour of low-key television than Micahel Palin crossing from Dubai to Bombay on a dhow on his Around the World in 80 Days travel show?
    Michael Palin on the dhow on his trip around the world in 80 days.The simple answer is “no.” There is no complex answer.The show aired on the BBC back in 1988 and not long afterward on PBS. I saw the series when it first aired in the United States, and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve managed to watch the TV series or listen to the audiobook since then. Palin’s challenge was to make it around the world in 80 days or less without the use of modern air travel.The people he meets and the experiences he has  (including being shaved by a blind barber in India) all unroll at an unhurried pace of another era. Palin is accompanied on his travels by a small film crew he refers to as his Passepartout (the valet for Jules Verne’s original hero Philias Fogg).

    The best episode of the series is where Palin has to cross the Persian Gulf on an old-school regional cargo boat (a dhow) that runs on a diesel engine supplemented by a sail when feasible. During his eight-day crossing, Palin connects with perhaps the purest part of his entire journey. He has only an open deck with a tarp cover for accommodations, and the toilet is an open seat over the sea. (Note: All is not well with Palin’s stomach for several days.) The journey across the Persian Gulf was slow, it could be scary at times, and it was often incredibly dull. But Palin writes that it was the part of the trip he will never forget. There’s no official way to see the series in the US anymore, but you can find a reasonably good copy of the series on the Internet Archive. It’s worth digging up.

    P.S. PBS is currently showing a reimagined version of Jules Verne’s Around the World in 80 Days that has been absolutely excellent, staring British actor David Tennant as Fogg, French actor Ibrahim Koma as Passepartout, and German actress Leonie Benesch (from Babylon Berlin) as journalist Abigail “Fix” Fortescue. Highly recommend getting caught up on it if you have access to PBS Passport streaming.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Questions Worth Asking (Maybe)

Why do news update e-mails insist on putting sports spoilers in the subject line?

Why do news update e-mails insist on putting sports spoilers in the subject line?

Olympic RingsOk, I get it. It’s almost impossible to avoid results of a high-profile Olympic event that takes place early in the morning but gets aired on TV during prime time that same day. And if you are on social media, you’re going to get spoilers.

But why do e-mail news updates, especially just general news updates, have to put the results into the subject line? I am, of course, referring to the dramatic results of this morning’s women’s figure skating finals.

I raised the question on Twitter earlier today on why the Washington Post had to put the results in the subject line of their e-mail and tagged several media reporters in a followup. I heard back from Post news media reporter Paul Farhi:

Which to me begs the question – Why keep doing it?

Years ago I used to watch a lot of motorcycle racing from around the world (MotoGP and World Superbike) and the United States that typically was on a multiple-day TV delay. Websites, like SuperbikePlanet.com, that gave real-time coverage of the races would send out e-mails with results of qualifying, supporting races, and the main events. And for all the final races they would use a subject line along the lines of “Italian MotoGP Results!” If you wanted to know the results, you clicked on it, if you wanted to wait you ignored it.

I understand that it’s vastly easier to avoid spoilers for obscure sports like motorcycle racing. But news outlets like the Washington Post or New York Times could do better on this. Especially since, “People have been complaining about this since the invention of  e-mails and news alerts.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Why do news update e-mails insist on putting sports spoilers in the subject line?

What a great year for Best Animated Feature Oscar Nominations

Generally, I have mixed feelings about the Best Animated Feature Oscar category. I mean, if Disney/Pixar comes out with a vaguely credible effort, they generally win. This was particularly true in 2016 when the oh-so-carefully constructed “important message” Zootopia beat out the wildly creative and original Kubo and the Two Strings.  Kubo was beautifully told through some of the best stop action animation in recent memory, it was family friendly, it told an uplifting story, and it featured a great cover of “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” from Regina Spektor. But Disney’s Zootopia was a huge success and everybody loved its rank sentimentality. (To be fair, Kubo did suffer from whitewashing, with prominent white actors voicing Asian characters.)

https://youtu.be/8hUOKjy-9-o

There have, of course, been some notable exceptions – most significantly when Sony’s Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse beat out Pixar’s Incredibles 2 and Disney’s Ralph Breaks The Internet. But there was no way the most innovative animated film in decades could have lost.

This year, however, there is a rich, diverse, and exciting field of nominees from three different studios. And I’ve been fortunate enough to see (well, mostly see) all of them.

Disney/Pixar has three nominations:

  • Encanto – A Columbian-set musical featuring hit songs from wunderkind Lin-Manuel Miranda. If you have small children, you have spent the last month (at least) listening to “We Don’t Talk About Bruno” on rapid repeat. It is also a wonderful film with great dancing, a fantastic Latinx-themed story, and truly vibrant animation. For me, this was the best animation out of the House of Mouse since at least Big Hero Six.

  • Raya and the Last Dragon – A well-done fantasy adventure set in legendary China, starring the voice acting of the ever-popular actor/comedian Awkwafina, and, to my eyes, looking a lot like a kid-friendly version of Ten Rings.

  • Luca – A Pixar release that I actually got so bored with I skipped much of the middle to get to the end. I never do this. And I was predisposed to love this movie. I mean, two boys lusting after a Vespa scooter over the course of the summer, right? And yet… It just suffered from a massive lack of storytelling. It felt a lot like a short film that just got stretched beyond its limits.

Sony Animation has one entry – The Mitchells vs. the Machines. Coming from the same studio that brought us Spider-Verse, it’s no surprise that this movie has an animation style that looks like nothing else – it just pops off the screen with bits of text and explosive colors. It tells the story of a teen-age girl who wants to go to film school. She has big issues with her father (and this is the great part) which have nothing to do with her being gay. Dad wants Katie to get outdoors, and Katie wants to shoot and edit films. In fact, her sexuality is an underplayed part of the story – it’s just who she is. There’s none of the “very special episodeness” of the story. I will confess that I’m biased on this film – friends of my eldest and his Dear Wife worked on it. But it would still be one of my favorites.

And finally, there’s Flee, the Danish-language (with segments in Dari) documentary about a real-life teen-aged refugee who has to live a lie in order to escape Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. It takes he and his family years to escape first to Russia and then to various European countries. Like Mitchells, the protagonist Amin is gay, and while it is an important part of who he is, it is not central to his challenges escaping to the West. Unlike all of these other films, Flee is hand-drawn (on computers) with 2D animation. It also switches from a muted earth-toned full-color pallet to gray-and-black lines-and-wash to depict the most perilous moments. Flee is rated PG-13, but it’s not for the younger set. It’s a disturbing and uplifting film that gets at the refugee experience in a way that is interesting, touching, and honest. In addition to being nominated for Best Animated Feature, Flee has also been nominated for Best Documentary Feature as well as Best International Feature.

So there is no question that Encanto is going to win Best Animated Feature. It tells a great story, it has fantastic animation, it has multiple hit songs, it hits both fun and serious notes, and it arguably could have been nominated for Best Picture.

Any other year, Mitchells could have been a contender for the win. It was so much fun with the technology-run-amok story line, an adorable pug sidekick, and all the fun moments from Katie’s short films. Mitchells was exactly the kind of escapism we needed on Netflix during the peak of the pandemic.

And then there is Flee. I have to admit that Flee was probably my favorite of all these films. I bought a copy so I could see it, but I can’t say I was looking forward to it. And yet, once I started Flee I don’t think I paused it more than once, if at all.  Serious, adult-oriented animated films never win this category. The Breadwinner, Persepolis, The Triplets of Belleville and the Wes Anderson animated features were never in serious contention. I hope that Flee will win one of the other two categories it is nominated in.

Encanto is going to be another win for Disney, and it’s going to deserve it. But don’t miss seeing Mitchells vs. the Machines or Flee. They are equally deserving of your time.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What a great year for Best Animated Feature Oscar Nominations

When did I realize I was all-in on e-books?

Last night.

Michael Palin, Travelling to Work, Diaries 1988-1998I had previously read and really enjoyed the first two volumes/decades of former Python/travel host Michael Palin’s diaries, but had held off reading the thick third volume, Travelling To Work, for several years.  I mean, the book has literally been collecting dust on my nightstand since I bought a used copy back in 2015.

It occurred to me last night, I hadn’t read it because it was too big to conveniently take with me places and was too heavy to comfortably read in bed. My Dear Wife asked why I didn’t just get a Kindle copy.

Well?

While I really don’t like buying the same book twice, I really do prefer e-books now. So I bought the e-book.

Why do I like e-books so much? A number of reasons.

  • As I hinted at above, I’m a big fan of my iPad tablet, and it goes with me almost everywhere. It’s a great platform to read on. It’s not very heavy. And it adjusts the background and brightness to the conditions around me. And Amazon’s Kindles are good readers as well.
  • It weighs less than a lot of the books I want to read.
  • It keeps track of where I am in the book.
  • It’s easy to highlight text or take notes on the text. (Not so important when I’m reading for pleasure, but much more significant with work reading.)
  • I can have instant gratification. If I want a book and it’s available in e-book format, I can have access to it instantly. (This sometimes is not such great thing.)
  • I don’t have to worry about losing the book in our big home library. I buy a lot of books for research at the moment I discover them, but I may not be reading them for months or even a year or two. By that point I might not know where the book is or even remember that I bought it. But if it’s on my e-book reading list, I know exactly where it is. Of course, a lot of the books I get are out-of-print used books only available in physical form, which is fine. But now I have fewer of those to keep track of.

And finally… my Dear Wife and I love books, and every bit of open wall space in our house is covered with bookshelves.  And all of those book shelves are at capacity. So when new physical books come in, lesser desired ones need to go out. E-books let me help dodge that problem.

I understand completely why people love physical books. We have a good collection of autographed books in the house. And I do love the heft and feel of a physical book. (But that heft and feel can also be a disadvantage.) And I totally get that people need time away from technology and screens. (My Dear Wife only reads books in paper form.)

I’ve heard a number of people say to me that they don’t like reading e-books on their computer or their phone, and I agree with them wholeheartedly! Neither of those are great platforms for reading a book. (Unless, perhaps, you have one of those giant big-*ss phones that I refuse to have.)

But a good e-book reader like a Kindle or a high-quality tablet like my iPad Pro can be an easy-on-the-eyes-and-wrist way to read. My late mum-in-law was a long-time Kindle user because the reader let her turn every book she bought into a large-print book.

How do you feel about e-books vs.paper books? (Please note, they are all “real” books.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on When did I realize I was all-in on e-books?

Sometimes you just need old favorites: A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 4

In December of 2020, when it became clear we were not going to be returning to normal life any time soon, we purchased a big honking 55-inch 4K TV and settled in for a year of watching movies at home. By Dec. 31, 2021, we had watched 236 movies either together or separately. This is one of series of blog posts about those films.


Sometimes you want to see the latest greatest movie at the theater, and sometimes you’re in the mood for an old classic you just haven’t gotten around to see yet. But sometimes you want to watch a comfortable favorite you’ve already seen too many times to keep track of. Those are the kind of movies we’ll be looking at this time. Mostly.

This batch starts out with Charade, which is often misattributed to Alfred Hitchcock. A.V. Club writes, “Some have called it the best Hitchcock movie that Hitchcock never made.” It is great, it does feel like a Hitchcock movie, but it was directed by Singin’ In The Rain’s Stanley Donen. It has all of the key elements of a great Hitchcock thriller: the ever glamorous Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn, moral ambiguity, mistaken identity, murder most foul, and something important missing (in this case, a large sum of money). My Dear Wife had seen it before with her mother, but it was a first watch for me.


Now we move into the true comfort category with The Maltese Falcon from 1941, which was the great John Huston’s directorial debut. It’s based on Dashiell Hammett’s novel and stars Humphrey Bogart, Mary Astor, Gladys George, Peter Lorre, and Sydney Greenstreet in his movie debut. (He had been a stage actor previously.) There’s so many reasons for this to be a favorite – Bogart, Lorre, and Greenstreet together always makes for a great movie, it’s a  film noir, and it has all the elements that let the movie play around with the restrictions of the Hays Code. (By the way, if you like this style of movie, be sure to check out Eddie Muller’s late-night weekend show Noir Alley on Turner Classic Movies.)


Return of the Jedi (directed by Richard Marquand) and Rogue One (directed by Gareth Edwards). I have always loved the original Star Wars trilogy. (Ok, I saw the 1977 Star Wars in the theater 13 times the summer it came out. It was pre-VCR, pre-cable. Get over it…) We had been gradually rewatching the initial movies, and it was time to view  Return of the Jedi. I do actually own a copy of the original theatrical cut of the movie, but it’s on a non-anamorphic DVD, so it is low resolution with black bars all around on a hi-def TV, so unfortunately I had to see the latest editing of it on Disney+. On the positive side, that copy is in 4K. Anytime I watch a Star Wars movie, I end up needing to rewatch Rogue One, by far the best of the subsequent films and really (in my mind) the fourth movie of the original series.  I love the darker elements of it that deal so wonderfully with the fact that the rebellion was really an insurgency. And it has a magnificent score from Michael Giacchino, by far my favorite currently working film composer. This will not be the only time this year I watch Rogue One.


The Man Who Would Be King, 1975, also directed by John Huston. This stars Sean Connery and Michael Caine as a pair of 19th century adventurers going deep into the Himalayas to pretend to be kings, maybe even gods. Needless to say, it doesn’t turn out well for our heroes. The movie also features Christopher Plummer as the narrator, Rudyard Kipling. Kipling, of course, was the author of the novella the film is based on, but he was not a character in the original story. Along with the great director and cast, it has an epic score from Maurice Jarre, best known for scoring Lawrence of Arabia,


Coming Next: Movies from 1935 to 1981

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Sometimes you just need old favorites: A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 4

Guest Blog Post – Looking Back at Banned Books

I saw on social media last week that my former student Stephanie Ballard Conrad was talking about studying banned books back when she was an undergraduate nearly 20 years ago. I asked if she could give us a look back at what she read and learned about challenged books years ago.  She was good enough to send me this. Thanks, Stephanie!

Stephanie Ballard Conrad

Stephanie Ballard Conrad

In the spring of 2019, I received an unexpected package via campus mail to my office at the university where I completed my undergraduate degree years before. As I opened the bulky manila envelope I found a blue Mead notebook with a pale pink Post-It note on the cover. It was from my former English professor, sharing a “blast from the past” — it was my reading journal from my independent study course from spring semester 2003.

I was quickly taken back sixteen years to my final semester as a public relations major, minoring in English literature. I had registered for one of the professor’s higher level literature classes and on the first day, every seat in the room was full. To help mitigate the size of her class, she offered the option of creating an independent study to students who were interested. I was game. We were advised to come up with a theme for our study and after weighing several options, I landed on banned books with my professor’s enthusiastic support and approval.

Every few years the concept of book banning becomes a hot topic and I think back to this college endeavor. I’m not sure if this was the spark that inspired my theme, but I knew that by exploring works that were controversial, I would find books that were interesting and relevant.

I started by looking at lists online of commonly banned books. Interestingly, I had already read many of them as part of other classes as early as middle school – To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou, Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, Animal Farm by George Orwell to name a few. These and other works are considered classics yet still face criticism for discussing topics perceived as controversial. Selecting other classics from the lists for my independent study, I chose to read Song of Solomon by Toni Morrison, Death of Salesman by Arthur Miller, Catcher in the Rye by JD Salinger (surprisingly, I didn’t read that in high school), and select chapters from Homer’s Odyssey.

One lasting lesson that has stuck with me, even eighteen years after that independent study, was that in considering the reasons why some books were banned during a certain time period, the actual passages or themes or words used didn’t seem so controversial years later. For instance, according to my notes, Death of a Salesman was banned in the 1970s and 1980s for profane language. The Odyssey was banned in ancient Greece because of themes of freedom which were contrary to Greek government ideals during that period in history.

Also, other books incorporate themes that continue to cause concern for some today. Song of Solomon and Catcher in the Rye deal with serious issues such as race, suicide, and sexuality – some of the exact same topics that are sparking book bans again in the US in 2022. These topics are complex and remain ones that people continue to face.

As I look back today, my opinion on banning books hasn’t changed nearly 20 years later. Even after having my own children who I want to protect and nurture, I still see these and other books as important. They teach valuable lessons and help readers know that they are not alone in their experiences and/or feelings.

I noted back in 2003 that some books were obviously more appropriate for certain age and reading levels, which I also still believe today. I wouldn’t expect to see Song of Solomon in an elementary library, for instance, but I would hope that high schoolers would see it on their library shelves. That caveat aside, book banning creates a culture of avoidance – and we can’t learn from avoidance.

The freedom that I felt from creating my own independent study and then selecting my own readings from lists of previously banned books is a kind of freedom that I hope other readers, young and old, continue to experience.

Stephanie A. Ballard Conrad, MAWest Virginia University, Class of 2003, 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Guest Blog Post – Looking Back at Banned Books

Book Banning & How Students Learn About The Holocaust

Banning, challenging, parental control… Call them what you want, there’s a lot of people out there upset about a lot of books in schools and libraries lately.

The United States has a long history of vocal parents being offended/upset by a variety of content in either teaching materials or library books.  Enough so that the American Library Association has a list of the most banned or challenged books in the United States, categorized by year.

If we go back 20 years ago to 2002, this is what the list looked like:

Top 10 Banned/Challenged Books for 2002
Out of 515 challenges recorded by the Office for Intellectual Freedom

  1. Harry Potter, by J.K. Rowling
    Reasons: occult/Satanism, violence
  2. Alice (series), by Phyllis Reynolds Naylor
    Reasons: homosexuality, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group
  3. The Chocolate War, by Robert Cormier
    Reasons: offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group
  4. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, by Maya Angelou
    Reasons: offensive language, sexually explicit, unsuited to age group, violence
  5. Taming the Star Runner, by S.E. Hinton
    Reason: offensive language
  6. Captain Underpants, by Dav Pilkey
    Reasons: offensive language, unsuited to age group
  7. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain
    Reason: offensive language
  8. Bridge to Terabithia, by Katherine Paterson
    Reasons: occult/Satanism, offensive language, violence
  9. Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry, by Mildred D. Taylor
    Reason: offensive language
  10. Julie of the Wolves, by Jean Craighead George
    Reasons: unsuited to age group, violence

An interesting mix, to be sure – ranging from the Harry Potter series  for satanism to I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings, for essentially clear discussing what it was like for Angelou to grow up in a culture of racism.

By 2020, the list had changed quite a bit:

Top 10 Most Challenged Books of 2020
The ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom tracked 156 challenges to library, school, and university materials and services in 2020. Of the 273 books that were targeted, here are the most challenged, along with the reasons cited for censoring the books:

  1. George by Alex Gino
    Reasons: Challenged, banned, and restricted for LGBTQIA+ content, conflicting with a religious viewpoint, and not reflecting “the values of our community”
  2. Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You by Ibram X. Kendi and Jason Reynolds
    Reasons: Banned and challenged because of author’s public statements, and because of claims that the book contains “selective storytelling incidents” and does not encompass racism against all people
  3. All American Boys by Jason Reynolds and Brendan Kiely
    Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity, drug use, and alcoholism, and because it was thought to promote anti-police views, contain divisive topics, and be “too much of a sensitive matter right now”
  4. Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson
    Reasons: Banned, challenged, and restricted because it was thought to contain a political viewpoint and it was claimed to be biased against male students, and for the novel’s inclusion of rape and profanity
  5. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie
    Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity, sexual references, and allegations of sexual misconduct by the author
  6. Something Happened in Our Town: A Child’s Story About Racial Injustice by Marianne Celano, Marietta Collins, and Ann Hazzard, illustrated by Jennifer Zivoin
    Reasons: Challenged for “divisive language” and because it was thought to promote anti-police views
  7. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
    Reasons: Banned and challenged for racial slurs and their negative effect on students, featuring a “white savior” character, and its perception of the Black experience
  8. Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
    Reasons: Banned and challenged for racial slurs and racist stereotypes, and their negative effect on students
  9. The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison
    Reasons: Banned and challenged because it was considered sexually explicit and depicts child sexual abuse
  10. The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas
    Reasons: Challenged for profanity, and it was thought to promote an anti-police message

The 2020 list is characterized by being primarily objections to discussions of race.


It is worth noting, however, that most of “challenged” books are not banned. Instead, they are subject to complaints from a few concerned parents, for whom they might get removed from a required reading list. Or perhaps a school district will send a consent note home with students. But that is the extent of most of the attempts to “ban” books in the United States. As an example, in 2019, Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird was removed from a Mississippi junior high reading list because of complaints that the book’s language “makes people uncomfortable.” The book was not removed from the school district’s libraries, however.


The idea that books make children or their parents uncomfortable has been a big part of why certain books have been attracting controversy this year.

The most noteworthy was the removal of Art Spielgelman’s Pulitzer-Prize winning graphic-novel portrayal of the Holocaust with mice as Jews and cats as Nazis from the McMinn County School District in Tennessee. Some parents had objected to the presence of curse words in the book along with a single portrayal of female nudity. (It shows a woman who has committed suicide.) Spiegelman’s parent survived the Auschwitz concentration camp, but his mother committed suicide.

Page 34 from Art Spiegelman's graphic novel "Maus"

A page from Art Spiegelman’s graphic novel “Maus.”

Spiegelman, who in addition writing and drawing Maus, is well known for his many New Yorker covers. The NY Times quotes Spiegelman as saying he was baffled by the removal:

“This is disturbing imagery,” he said in an interview on Thursday, which is Holocaust Remembrance Day. “But you know what? It’s disturbing history.”

As I was digging into material about the attempts to control what middle-school students learn about the Holocaust, I was struck by the following comments from Jewish graphic-novel artist/writer Sophie Goldstein:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Book Banning & How Students Learn About The Holocaust

A Murder of Hitchcock Films: A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 3

In December of 2020, when it became clear we were not going to be returning to normal life any time soon, we purchased a big honking 55-inch 4K TV and settled in for a year of watching movies at home. By Dec. 31, 2021, we had watched 236 movies either together or separately. This is one of series of blog posts about those films.

I’ve always loved collective nouns – unique words that describe a group. For example, you have a gaggle of geese, a pod of whales, an unkindness of ravens, or a stand of trees. For today, I would like to claim the right to coin a new one – A Murder of Hitchcock Films.

Alfred Hitchcock has long been known as the master of suspense or horror films, but he also did comedies, espionage flix, and thrillers.  Over the last year we watched a lot of Hitchcock canon, both familiar and rare. Given that Turner Classic Movies had a week featuring Hitchcock’s films, we’ve got five in a row here:

  • 1955 – The Trouble With Harry, directed by Alfred Hitchcock, and starring a very young Shirley MacLaine in her movie debut. It also stars Edmund Gwenn, John Forsythe, Mildred Natwick, and Jerry Mathers (of Leave it to Beaver fame). This is a rare comic outing for Hitchcock, where the trouble with Harry is that he is dead. There are several characters in it who all have reason to wish Harry dead, and all of them suspect that they might be the killer. This movie is an absolute hoot and is one of my favorites of the lesser known of the Master’s films.

  • 1959 – North by Northwest, directed by Hitchcock, and starring Cary Grant, Eva Marie Saint, and James Mason. This is the movie that everyone thinks about when it comes to Hitchcock. It has everything – mistaken identity, a chase by a crop duster airplane, a chase across Mt. Rushmore, and a cool blonde. I realize this is an acclaimed film and much beloved, but for me the plot is just a bit over the top.

  • 1954 – Rear Window, directed by Hitchcock, and starring Jimmy Stewart, Grace Kelly, Wendell Corey, Thelma Ritter, and Raymond Burr. This is by far my favorite Hitchcock film – It has a great mix of romance, style, menace, and murder, along with a giant dose of humor. It’s all shot in a very confined space – Jimmy Stewart’s apartment and the central courtyard of the apartment building and row various windows he can see into from his apartment. Instead of a trailer, I’ve got a clip of the opening two-plus minutes of the film. It’s a long tracking shot that introduces most of the main characters and plot lines of the film. It’a  great opener.

  • 1956 – The Man Who Knew Too Much, directed by Hitchcock, starring Jimmy Stewart and Doris Day. This film won an Oscar for best song for Doris Day’s rendition of “Que Sera Sera (Whatever Will Be, Will Be)”.  This was Hitch’s second movie using this title, though it is quite different from his 1934 version. Unlike so many songs in movies, Day’s Que Sera Sera is a key plot point in the movie’s climax that takes place in the Royal Albert Hall. I’m rather fond of it, but my Dear Wife is critical of it for the same reason she dislikes the modern horror movie, A Quiet Place. I won’t explain her objection to either movie, but after watching them, it shouldn’t be hard to figure out. In place of the trailer, here’s Day singing “Que Sera Sera” with Christopher Olsen, who plays her son.

  • 1966 – Torn Curtain, directed by Hitchcock, starring Paul Newman and Julie Andrews. I don’t have a lot to say about this cold war thriller as I was tired that night and slept though most of it while my Dear Wife and mum-in-law watched. The plot, involving a spy caper in the old East Germany is dated, and it just didn’t capture my attention. Responsible viewers can disagree.


And finally – Jumping out of sequence here, I watched the Marx Brothers A Night at the Opera recently, and I think its third act is the best of any movie comedy ever made. So many other movie draw from it. My Favorite Year’s finale is clearly an homage to it.

https://youtu.be/rsAvTNUA3TY


Coming Next: A mix of movies from 1941 to 2016

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Murder of Hitchcock Films: A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 3

A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 2: Chillin’ with Deathtrap and Dickens

In December of 2020, when it became clear we were not going to be returning to normal life any time soon, we purchased a big honking 55-inch 4K TV and settled in for a year of watching movies at home. By Dec. 31, 2021, we had watched 236 movies either together or separately. This is one of series of blog posts about those films. 

Pretty conventional list for this edition – a pair of 1980s classics along with a more recent Christmas flick. (Remember we were still in December of 2020 at this point.)

  • 1983 – The Big Chill, directed and co-written by Lawrence Kasdan, staring Tom Berenger, Glenn Close, Jeff Goldblum, William Hurt, Kevin Kline, Mary Kay Place, Meg Tilly, JoBeth Williams, along with a host of 60s and 70s R&B, soul and pop songs.  To be honest, in retrospect The Big Chill is more memorable for the excellent soundtrack and Glodblum’s snarky performance as a People magazine writer than for the story or the rest of the actors. If you want vintage Kasdan, check out his directorial debut – 1981’s neo-noir Body Heat, but make sure you have the kids tucked in bed first! Instead of the trailer, here’s the opening credits that sums up what is best with the movie:

  • 1982 – Deathtrap, directed by Sidney Lumet and starring Michael Caine, Christopher Reeve, and Dyan Cannon. This stagey black comedy/mystery is based on the 1978 play by novelist/playright Ira Levin. It’s a fun cat-and-mouse story where the viewer is never quite sure what is real and what is deception. If you’re going to watch it, don’t do any research first. Just dive in. Several aspects of it are rather dated, but it’s still good, dark fun. Director Lumet is responsible for one of my all-time favorite movies – Network. (The trailer is short and basically spoiler free.)

  • 2017 – The Man Who Invented Christmas, directed by Bharat Nalluri and starring Dan Stevens, Christopher Plummer, and Jonathan Pryce. A fanciful telling of how Charles Dickens came to write A Christmas Carol when he desperately needed a hit after his three previous books had been flops. It’s a quirky look at the creative process in which Dickens’ characters come to life around him and harangue him mercilessly. While the central elements of the story are reasonably accurate, remember that this is fundamentally a fantasy and not a biopic. Worth a view at Christmastime, especially if you have a houseful of writers, as we did. (I’m a textbook author, and my wife and late mum-in-law wrote women’s fiction together.)

Up Next: A Murder of Hitchcock Films

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 2: Chillin’ with Deathtrap and Dickens

Dreary Birthday, Edgar Allan Poe!

Meme of E.A. Poe with text "IF YOU'RE GETTIN WALLED INTO A CELLAR I FEEL BAD FOR YOU SON. I GOT 99 PROBLEMS BUT AMONTILLADO AIN'T ONEToday is horror and mystery writing pioneer Edgar Allan Poe’s birthday. Born January 19, 1809, he is known for writing the early detective story The Murders in the Rue Morgue, short horror stories (The Cask of Amontillado is my personal favorite), and a range of verse, the best known of which is the narrative poem The Raven. It was originally published on January 29, 1845 in the New York Evening MirrorI originally shared this in a blog post from Jan. 29, 2018.)

The Raven tells of a young man slowly descending into madness while gazing at a visiting raven while he mourns the loss of his beloved, Lenore.

The poem’s fame has lived on in part because of how is has repeatedly come to the forefront of popular culture.

Back in 1976, the prog rock band Alan Parsons Project did a concept album on the works of Poe, with the music on side 1 anchored around the band’s interpretation of The Raven. Here’s a video that was created years later by an Alan Parsons fan:

There was also the Roger Corman movie made it in 1963 with Vincent Price, Peter Lorre and Boris Karloff, but it was much more a screwball comedy than a horror movie, even though it was written by horror master Richard Matheson. (Think of it as more of a predecessor to Young Frankenstein, perhaps.)  Here’s the trailer, but it really doesn’t capture the film’s real style:

If you haven’t read it since you were in high school or middle school, take a look at it now:

The Raven
By Edgar Allan Poe

Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore –
While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.
“‘Tis some visitor,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door –
Only this and nothing more.”

Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly I wished the morrow; – vainly I had sought to borrow
From my books surcease of sorrow – sorrow for the lost Lenore –
For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore –
Nameless here for evermore.

And the silken, sad, uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Thrilled me – filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before;
So that now, to still the beating of my heart, I stood repeating
“‘Tis some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door –
Some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door; –
This it is and nothing more.”

Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
“Sir,” said I, “or Madam, truly yours forgiveness I implore;
But the fact is I was napping, and so gently you came rapping,
And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at my chamber door,
That I scarce was sure I heard you” – here I opened wide the door; –
Darkness there, and nothing more.

Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
But the silence was unbroken, and the stillness gave no token,
And the only word there spoken was the whispered word, “Lenore?” –
This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word, “Lenore!”
Merely this and nothing more.

Then into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning,
Soon again I heard a tapping something louder than before.
“Surely,” said I, “surely that is something at my window lattice;
Let me see, then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore –
Let my heart be still a moment, and this mystery explore; –
‘Tis the wind and nothing more!”

Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately Raven of the saintly days of yore;
Not the least obeisance made he; not an instant stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door –
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door –
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.

Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
“Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,” I said, “art sure no craven,
Ghastly grim and ancient Raven wandering from the Nightly shore –
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night’s Plutonian shore!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
Though its answer little meaning – little relevancy bore;
For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being
Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his chamber door –
Bird or beast upon the sculptured bust above his chamber door,
With such name as “Nevermore.”

But the Raven, sitting lonely on that placid bust, spoke only
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered – not a feather then he fluttered –
Till I scarcely more than muttered, “Other friends have flown before –
On the morrow he will leave me, as my Hopes have flown before.”
Then the bird said, “Nevermore.”

Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
“Doubtless,” said I, “what it utters is its only stock and store
Caught from some unhappy master whom unmerciful Disaster
Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore –
Till the dirges of his Hope the melancholy burden bore
Of ‘Never-nevermore.’”

But the Raven still beguiling all my sad soul into smiling,
Straight I wheeled a cushioned seat in front of bird and bust and door;
Then, upon the velvet sinking, I betook myself to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore –
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking “Nevermore.”

This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
To the fowl whose fiery eyes now burned into my bosom’s core;
This and more I sat divining, with my head at ease reclining
On the cushion’s velvet lining that the lamp-light gloated o’er,
But whose velvet-violet lining with the lamp-light gloating o’er,
She shall press, ah, nevermore!

Then, methought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
Swung by seraphim whose foot-falls tinkled on the tufted floor.
“Wretch,” I cried, “thy God hath lent thee – by these angels he hath sent thee
Respite – respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Lenore;
Quaff, oh quaff this kind nepenthe and forget this lost Lenore!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

“Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil! – prophet still, if bird or devil! –
Whether Tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted –
On this home by Horror haunted – tell me truly, I implore –
Is there – is there balm in Gilead? tell me – tell me, I implore!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

“Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil – prophet still, if bird or devil!
By that Heaven that bends above us – by that God we both adore –
Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distant Aidenn,
It shall clasp a sainted maiden whom the angels name Lenore –
Clasp a rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore.”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

“Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!” I shrieked, upstarting –
“Get thee back into the tempest and the Night’s Plutonian shore!
Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken!
Leave my loneliness unbroken! – quit the bust above my door!
Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;
And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming,
And the lamp-light o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
Shall be lifted – nevermore!

Tip of the hat to my UNK colleague Sam Umland for sharing this anniversary on Twitter this morning.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Dreary Birthday, Edgar Allan Poe!