A Murder of Hitchcock Films: A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 3

In December of 2020, when it became clear we were not going to be returning to normal life any time soon, we purchased a big honking 55-inch 4K TV and settled in for a year of watching movies at home. By Dec. 31, 2021, we had watched 236 movies either together or separately. This is one of series of blog posts about those films.

I’ve always loved collective nouns – unique words that describe a group. For example, you have a gaggle of geese, a pod of whales, an unkindness of ravens, or a stand of trees. For today, I would like to claim the right to coin a new one – A Murder of Hitchcock Films.

Alfred Hitchcock has long been known as the master of suspense or horror films, but he also did comedies, espionage flix, and thrillers.  Over the last year we watched a lot of Hitchcock canon, both familiar and rare. Given that Turner Classic Movies had a week featuring Hitchcock’s films, we’ve got five in a row here:

  • 1955 – The Trouble With Harry, directed by Alfred Hitchcock, and starring a very young Shirley MacLaine in her movie debut. It also stars Edmund Gwenn, John Forsythe, Mildred Natwick, and Jerry Mathers (of Leave it to Beaver fame). This is a rare comic outing for Hitchcock, where the trouble with Harry is that he is dead. There are several characters in it who all have reason to wish Harry dead, and all of them suspect that they might be the killer. This movie is an absolute hoot and is one of my favorites of the lesser known of the Master’s films.

  • 1959 – North by Northwest, directed by Hitchcock, and starring Cary Grant, Eva Marie Saint, and James Mason. This is the movie that everyone thinks about when it comes to Hitchcock. It has everything – mistaken identity, a chase by a crop duster airplane, a chase across Mt. Rushmore, and a cool blonde. I realize this is an acclaimed film and much beloved, but for me the plot is just a bit over the top.

  • 1954 – Rear Window, directed by Hitchcock, and starring Jimmy Stewart, Grace Kelly, Wendell Corey, Thelma Ritter, and Raymond Burr. This is by far my favorite Hitchcock film – It has a great mix of romance, style, menace, and murder, along with a giant dose of humor. It’s all shot in a very confined space – Jimmy Stewart’s apartment and the central courtyard of the apartment building and row various windows he can see into from his apartment. Instead of a trailer, I’ve got a clip of the opening two-plus minutes of the film. It’s a long tracking shot that introduces most of the main characters and plot lines of the film. It’a  great opener.

  • 1956 – The Man Who Knew Too Much, directed by Hitchcock, starring Jimmy Stewart and Doris Day. This film won an Oscar for best song for Doris Day’s rendition of “Que Sera Sera (Whatever Will Be, Will Be)”.  This was Hitch’s second movie using this title, though it is quite different from his 1934 version. Unlike so many songs in movies, Day’s Que Sera Sera is a key plot point in the movie’s climax that takes place in the Royal Albert Hall. I’m rather fond of it, but my Dear Wife is critical of it for the same reason she dislikes the modern horror movie, A Quiet Place. I won’t explain her objection to either movie, but after watching them, it shouldn’t be hard to figure out. In place of the trailer, here’s Day singing “Que Sera Sera” with Christopher Olsen, who plays her son.

  • 1966 – Torn Curtain, directed by Hitchcock, starring Paul Newman and Julie Andrews. I don’t have a lot to say about this cold war thriller as I was tired that night and slept though most of it while my Dear Wife and mum-in-law watched. The plot, involving a spy caper in the old East Germany is dated, and it just didn’t capture my attention. Responsible viewers can disagree.


And finally – Jumping out of sequence here, I watched the Marx Brothers A Night at the Opera recently, and I think its third act is the best of any movie comedy ever made. So many other movie draw from it. My Favorite Year’s finale is clearly an homage to it.

https://youtu.be/rsAvTNUA3TY


Coming Next: A mix of movies from 1941 to 2016

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Murder of Hitchcock Films: A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 3

A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 2: Chillin’ with Deathtrap and Dickens

In December of 2020, when it became clear we were not going to be returning to normal life any time soon, we purchased a big honking 55-inch 4K TV and settled in for a year of watching movies at home. By Dec. 31, 2021, we had watched 236 movies either together or separately. This is one of series of blog posts about those films. 

Pretty conventional list for this edition – a pair of 1980s classics along with a more recent Christmas flick. (Remember we were still in December of 2020 at this point.)

  • 1983 – The Big Chill, directed and co-written by Lawrence Kasdan, staring Tom Berenger, Glenn Close, Jeff Goldblum, William Hurt, Kevin Kline, Mary Kay Place, Meg Tilly, JoBeth Williams, along with a host of 60s and 70s R&B, soul and pop songs.  To be honest, in retrospect The Big Chill is more memorable for the excellent soundtrack and Glodblum’s snarky performance as a People magazine writer than for the story or the rest of the actors. If you want vintage Kasdan, check out his directorial debut – 1981’s neo-noir Body Heat, but make sure you have the kids tucked in bed first! Instead of the trailer, here’s the opening credits that sums up what is best with the movie:

  • 1982 – Deathtrap, directed by Sidney Lumet and starring Michael Caine, Christopher Reeve, and Dyan Cannon. This stagey black comedy/mystery is based on the 1978 play by novelist/playright Ira Levin. It’s a fun cat-and-mouse story where the viewer is never quite sure what is real and what is deception. If you’re going to watch it, don’t do any research first. Just dive in. Several aspects of it are rather dated, but it’s still good, dark fun. Director Lumet is responsible for one of my all-time favorite movies – Network. (The trailer is short and basically spoiler free.)

  • 2017 – The Man Who Invented Christmas, directed by Bharat Nalluri and starring Dan Stevens, Christopher Plummer, and Jonathan Pryce. A fanciful telling of how Charles Dickens came to write A Christmas Carol when he desperately needed a hit after his three previous books had been flops. It’s a quirky look at the creative process in which Dickens’ characters come to life around him and harangue him mercilessly. While the central elements of the story are reasonably accurate, remember that this is fundamentally a fantasy and not a biopic. Worth a view at Christmastime, especially if you have a houseful of writers, as we did. (I’m a textbook author, and my wife and late mum-in-law wrote women’s fiction together.)

Up Next: A Murder of Hitchcock Films

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 2: Chillin’ with Deathtrap and Dickens

Dreary Birthday, Edgar Allan Poe!

Meme of E.A. Poe with text "IF YOU'RE GETTIN WALLED INTO A CELLAR I FEEL BAD FOR YOU SON. I GOT 99 PROBLEMS BUT AMONTILLADO AIN'T ONEToday is horror and mystery writing pioneer Edgar Allan Poe’s birthday. Born January 19, 1809, he is known for writing the early detective story The Murders in the Rue Morgue, short horror stories (The Cask of Amontillado is my personal favorite), and a range of verse, the best known of which is the narrative poem The Raven. It was originally published on January 29, 1845 in the New York Evening MirrorI originally shared this in a blog post from Jan. 29, 2018.)

The Raven tells of a young man slowly descending into madness while gazing at a visiting raven while he mourns the loss of his beloved, Lenore.

The poem’s fame has lived on in part because of how is has repeatedly come to the forefront of popular culture.

Back in 1976, the prog rock band Alan Parsons Project did a concept album on the works of Poe, with the music on side 1 anchored around the band’s interpretation of The Raven. Here’s a video that was created years later by an Alan Parsons fan:

There was also the Roger Corman movie made it in 1963 with Vincent Price, Peter Lorre and Boris Karloff, but it was much more a screwball comedy than a horror movie, even though it was written by horror master Richard Matheson. (Think of it as more of a predecessor to Young Frankenstein, perhaps.)  Here’s the trailer, but it really doesn’t capture the film’s real style:

If you haven’t read it since you were in high school or middle school, take a look at it now:

The Raven
By Edgar Allan Poe

Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore –
While I nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of some one gently rapping, rapping at my chamber door.
“‘Tis some visitor,” I muttered, “tapping at my chamber door –
Only this and nothing more.”

Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly I wished the morrow; – vainly I had sought to borrow
From my books surcease of sorrow – sorrow for the lost Lenore –
For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore –
Nameless here for evermore.

And the silken, sad, uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Thrilled me – filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before;
So that now, to still the beating of my heart, I stood repeating
“‘Tis some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door –
Some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door; –
This it is and nothing more.”

Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
“Sir,” said I, “or Madam, truly yours forgiveness I implore;
But the fact is I was napping, and so gently you came rapping,
And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at my chamber door,
That I scarce was sure I heard you” – here I opened wide the door; –
Darkness there, and nothing more.

Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
But the silence was unbroken, and the stillness gave no token,
And the only word there spoken was the whispered word, “Lenore?” –
This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word, “Lenore!”
Merely this and nothing more.

Then into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning,
Soon again I heard a tapping something louder than before.
“Surely,” said I, “surely that is something at my window lattice;
Let me see, then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore –
Let my heart be still a moment, and this mystery explore; –
‘Tis the wind and nothing more!”

Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately Raven of the saintly days of yore;
Not the least obeisance made he; not an instant stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door –
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door –
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.

Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
“Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,” I said, “art sure no craven,
Ghastly grim and ancient Raven wandering from the Nightly shore –
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night’s Plutonian shore!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

Much I marvelled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
Though its answer little meaning – little relevancy bore;
For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being
Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his chamber door –
Bird or beast upon the sculptured bust above his chamber door,
With such name as “Nevermore.”

But the Raven, sitting lonely on that placid bust, spoke only
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered – not a feather then he fluttered –
Till I scarcely more than muttered, “Other friends have flown before –
On the morrow he will leave me, as my Hopes have flown before.”
Then the bird said, “Nevermore.”

Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
“Doubtless,” said I, “what it utters is its only stock and store
Caught from some unhappy master whom unmerciful Disaster
Followed fast and followed faster till his songs one burden bore –
Till the dirges of his Hope the melancholy burden bore
Of ‘Never-nevermore.’”

But the Raven still beguiling all my sad soul into smiling,
Straight I wheeled a cushioned seat in front of bird and bust and door;
Then, upon the velvet sinking, I betook myself to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore –
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking “Nevermore.”

This I sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
To the fowl whose fiery eyes now burned into my bosom’s core;
This and more I sat divining, with my head at ease reclining
On the cushion’s velvet lining that the lamp-light gloated o’er,
But whose velvet-violet lining with the lamp-light gloating o’er,
She shall press, ah, nevermore!

Then, methought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
Swung by seraphim whose foot-falls tinkled on the tufted floor.
“Wretch,” I cried, “thy God hath lent thee – by these angels he hath sent thee
Respite – respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Lenore;
Quaff, oh quaff this kind nepenthe and forget this lost Lenore!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

“Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil! – prophet still, if bird or devil! –
Whether Tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted –
On this home by Horror haunted – tell me truly, I implore –
Is there – is there balm in Gilead? tell me – tell me, I implore!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

“Prophet!” said I, “thing of evil – prophet still, if bird or devil!
By that Heaven that bends above us – by that God we both adore –
Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distant Aidenn,
It shall clasp a sainted maiden whom the angels name Lenore –
Clasp a rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore.”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

“Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!” I shrieked, upstarting –
“Get thee back into the tempest and the Night’s Plutonian shore!
Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul hath spoken!
Leave my loneliness unbroken! – quit the bust above my door!
Take thy beak from out my heart, and take thy form from off my door!”
Quoth the Raven, “Nevermore.”

And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;
And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming,
And the lamp-light o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
Shall be lifted – nevermore!

Tip of the hat to my UNK colleague Sam Umland for sharing this anniversary on Twitter this morning.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Dreary Birthday, Edgar Allan Poe!

Let Freedom Ring on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

Editor’s Note: I originally posted this on Aug. 28, 2017, the 54th anniversary of Dr. King’s “I have a dream” speech.

“And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!

Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado!

Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California!

But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia!

Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee!

Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Let Freedom Ring on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 1

2021 was a rough year, given a pandemic that kept many of us at home for much of the year. There were also public conflicts over people refusing masks and vaccinations.  In my home, we wondered:

  • Could we go out to eat?
  • Could I teach classes in person?
  • How could we keep the vulnerable around us safe?
  • Could we still go to the movies?

For my family, 2021 really started in December of 2020. Many of you may know that my wonderful mum-in-law lived with Dear Wife and me for the last 22 years. MIL’s taste in movies for much of that time matched mine much more closely than my wife’s does, and so until hear health deteriorated several years ago, MIL was my frequent movie-theater-going companion.

I say that 2021 started in December of 2020 because that was when MIL started her final decline with multiple ambulance rides to the ER that would end with her moving into nursing care in April and dying in July.

Our home viewing area.

This is where we watched most of the 236 movies we viewed between the beginning of December 2020 and Dec. 31, 2021

Because we had an invalid at home, and because I’m vulnerable as a diabetic, most our time for the pandemic years has been either at the office or at home. So in December of 2020, when it became clear we were not going to returning to normal life anything soon, we purchased a big honking 55-inch 4K TV and settled in for a year of watching movies at home. By Dec. 31, 2021, we had watched 236 movies either together or separately.

Some of these movies were repeat viewings (I watched Lin-Manuel Miranda’s musical In The Heights four times last summer. It was my favorite movie of the year.), a few of them were watched in movie theaters (mostly our wonderful community The World Theatre), but most were older movies we watched at home (close to half of the movies we watched were on the classic movie cable-channel/streaming service Turner Classic Movies).

List of movies from December 2020I’m a big fan of the little Field Notes notebooks, and so I decided to start keeping a record of every movie we watched last year. Over the next several weeks, I plan to talk about all these films and how this year of movie-watching transformed our lives in so many ways.

Our movies for December 2020 started out with a couple of old favorites of my mum-in-law:

  • 1982  – Agatha Christie’s Evil Under the Sun, directed by Guy Hamilton and starring Peter Ustinov as detective Hercule Poirot, along with Maggie Smith and Diana Rigg. We are all Christie fans in the house, but DW and MIL much prefer David Suchet’s version from the BBC to that of Ustinov. (Watched by MIL and DW.)

  • 1973 – The Sting, directed by George Roy Hill and starring Paul Newman, Robert Redford, and Robert Shaw. This was quite possibly MIL’s favorite film starring her favorite actor – Paul Newman. She would watch anything with Newman in it, but this timeless caper film with the Scott Joplin ragtime piano soundtrack was her go-to movie when nothing else would make her happy. As you will see, we watched a number of other Newman films during the year, almost always at the behest of MIL. (Watched by DW and MIL.)Little known fact: Bob Seeger wrote his piano ballad “We’ve Got Tonight” right after watching The Sting.He saw a scene in the film where Redford puts the moves on a waitress, who says, “I don’t even know you.” Redford replies: “You know me. I’m the same as you. It’s two in the morning and I don’t know nobody.”

    “That just hit me real hard,” Seger told during his 1994 interview with the Detroit Free Press. “The next day I wrote ‘We’ve Got Tonight,’ this song about two people who say ‘I’m tired. It’s late at night. I know you don’t really dig me, and I don’t really dig you, but this is all we’ve got, so let’s do it.’ The sexual revolution was still going strong then.”

Up next: A pair of 1980s movies and modern Christmas film

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Year in Movies 2021 – Part 1

Looking Back at the January 6th Insurrection – History Has Its Eyes On You

Update: 1/6/25  — It’s now been four years since this shameful day.


One year ago today an angry mob assaulted the United Staters Capitol Building in an attempt to stop the counting of electoral votes and overturn the results of a free and fair presidential election. Here are links to a series of posts I wrote at the time. 

Words Matter – Thoughts on Wednesday’s (1/6/21) Insurrection, Part 1

Taking a look at how a variety of news media responded to these events.


Words Matter: Stories From The Insurrection, Part 2

Personal stories from journalists who covered the January 6th violence and how journalists knew about the potential for violence in advance.


What does the 1st Amendment Mean? Stories from the Insurrection, Part 3

Discussion about how social media companies have freedom to control what they publish that is not limited by the First Amendment. The day Former President Trump got banned for life from Twitter.


Newspaper Editorials: Stories from the Insurrection, Part 4

Headlines and editorials about the January 6 riots. Perhaps the most surprising of these was the über-conservative Wall Street Journal editorial page’s take that Former President Trump should have resigned. (Note – Trump did not resign.)


Front Pages: Stories from the Insurrection, Part 5

Front pages from across the country on the day after the January 6th Insurrection. 


Stories of Hope from the Insurrection, Part 6

While there have been endless dark stories coming out of the January 6, 2021  insurrection in Washington, D.C., there have also been some positive signs coming forward as well. People standing up for what is right, companies trying to uphold public civility, moments of grace


And finally – Why Rep. Andy Kim is always awesome!

On an unrelated note – Here is a a brief collection of tweets showing how awesome New Jersey Representative Andy Kim is. If only all our representatives could be this great!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Looking Back at the January 6th Insurrection – History Has Its Eyes On You

Remembering Michael Nesmith of The Monkees – and so, so much more

I just saw this afternoon that singer/songwriter/music video pioneer Michael Nesmith had died of natural causes today at age 78. Here’s what I wrote about him back in 2003 for what I think must have been the first edition of my textbook. I’ve made a couple of corrections to the text to account for the passage of time.

Music trivia fans know that the Buggles’s song “Video Killed the Radio Star” was the first video to be played on MTV when the cable service was launched on August 1, 1981. But few know that the idea of MTV and music videos has its roots in the work of a musician and video visionary named Michael Nesmith in the 1960s and 1970s.

Nesmith, along with Davy Jones, Peter Tork, and Mickey Dolenz, made up The Monkees, the world’s first “manufactured” rock band.  At the time, Nesmith was generally considered to be the only “real” musician, something Nesmith later disputed. Be that as it may, the four performers were primarily picked as actors for a television show about a rock bank from out of the 440 who appeared for an audition in 1965.

The idea that rock music could be the basis not only of movies but of popular television programming was firmly established by The Monkees, but in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Nesmith took the concept a giant step further.

Following his stint with The Monkees, he wrote songs for a number of stars, including Linda Ronstadt, produced the cult classic film Repo Man, won a Grammy award, started a successful home video company, and wrote at least one novel.

https://youtu.be/SMkiZ9tO-Zs

Nesmith performing his song Different Drum that was an early hit for a very young Linda Ronstadt.

But his biggest contribution to popular culture was the development of the modern music video.

“In the mid-‘70s, I had been asked to do a promotional film for a record that I had done called Rio, to be distributed in Europe,” Nesmith told a reporter from the Los Angeles Times. “I made something very lavish, not understanding that what they wanted me to do is stand in front of a camera and just play my guitar and sing the song. And it met with great approval in Europe. One of the ways European records were promoted at the time was to play these clips on state television…. What I said was, ‘Gee, you mean to tell me they’re using television to promote hit records?’ That sounded like a pretty good idea to me.”

https://youtu.be/WnpcTsy10dE

While Nesmith’s Rio wasn’t the first music video, it did establish that videos could be surreal, stylish, and more important than the song itself. Just as recording technology would make the record more important than the live performance, so did the video take on more importance in many cases than the record.

Nesmith’s work on music videos was financed by his $47 million inheritance (his mother was the inventor of Liquid Paper). It was this money that allowed him to create his long-form video Elephant Parts, which won the first video Grammy Award.

https://youtu.be/L951UPDh_CU

My favorite part of Nesmith’s hour-long video album Elephant Parts wasn’t actually a music video but rather the biting comic sketch “Neighborhood Nukes.”

Following the success of Rio, Nesmith thought he could put together a good youth-oriented television show using music videos. He created the program Popclips for the then-new cable channel Nickleodeon. Nesmith produced 56 episodes of the program, and it was successful enough to become the model for an entire cable channel – MTV – which was created by Nickelodeon’s then owner, Warner-Amex, in 1981.

A history of the music video and MTV, with their debt to Michael Nesmith and his show Popclips from the series Nick Knacks – a retrospective show about the cable channel Nickelodeon.

Music videos were a way of promoting records, and in some respects they have more in common with a commercial than with a Hollywood film. The music often takes second place to the stunning visuals included in these short films, which have little to do with the actual narrative of the song.

Nesmith saw music videos as a development that is something more than “radio with pictures”:

“[It’s] a whole new art from – the natural marriage of music and visuals. If you put them together you have supercharged the medium. . . .

“The long-term vision, I think, is when the musicians and the filmmaker come together as a team, or in one individual, and begin to marry the grammar of the two forms…. Then we’ll see something really spectacular.”


Memories of Michael Nesmith on Twitter:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Remembering Michael Nesmith of The Monkees – and so, so much more

For Your Holiday Reading List – Journal articles with news you can use

There are a lot of of journal articles out there that cover a very narrow theoretical discipline that develop important knowledge for people in that exact area of scholarship. But occasionally there come articles that can actually be used by people in the same general field in our classroom teaching. I’ve come across two of these in the last few weeks and thought I would share them with you.

Shugofa Dastgeer (@ShugofaD) and Daxton Stewart (@MediaLawProf) have a new article in The International Journal of Communication on how Muslim-majority countries handle free speech and free press issues in their constitutions. This is something Westerners don’t know nearly enough about.


Perry Parks (@perryrparks) has an article out in Journalism Practice that examines how CNN’s CNN 10 program for school children pushes a narrative of “balance” as being the highest journalistic value.


This last one is not a journal article but an interesting opinion piece from Michael Socolow (@MichaelSocolow) that analyzes the media’s obsession with the importance of Fox News.

What are some other accessible recent journal articles that could be of value in our teaching and for our undergrads to read? Would love to see more.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on For Your Holiday Reading List – Journal articles with news you can use

Student Voices from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Editor’s Note: It has been a long year dealing with COVID-19 and its long-term fallout. Here is a collection of blog entries about getting through the last year from my commentary and blogging students. Really impressed with what these young people have to say.


Alexis is a student who works full-time along with going to school. Having to be isolated due to COVID-19 made life tough for her.


Jiyoon Kim is a South Korean exchange student at UNK, and when she is feeling too far from home, she makes kalguksu (noodle in soup).


Grace McDonald works at answering the question of “Why are you in choir” through the voice of one of her classmates.


Makenzie Krumland tells the story of a young woman and her family dealing with COVID-19 while stranded in another country.


Ryan Range looks at how his school life changed when everyone was sent home from school in March of 2020. The events of that spring and summer led to him creating an award-winning short film about The World Theatre.


Ashely Hopkins is another of my students who turns to making soup (in this case, chili) when the weather turns cold and there’s not really anywhere to go.


Caity VanDeWalle takes an almost short story approach to telling the story of how her friend Abby dealt with having to go home during the early stages of the pandemic.


And finally… During the summer of 2020 I broke out of isolation for a week or so of motorcycling in Arkansas with an old friend. During that trip I discovered that Bass Reeves, Black lawman, from the HBO series Watchmen was a real person.

Posted in JMC 406 | Tagged , | Comments Off on Student Voices from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Guest Blog Post: Olympic Games are great for propagandists – how the lessons of Hitler’s Olympics loom over Beijing 2022

Editor’s Note: Thanks to my friend Dr. Michael Socolow, University of Maine, for letting me reprint his article from The Conversation.  Dr. Socolow takes a look at China’s repression and human rights abuses and asks whether cheerful media coverage of the Beijing Olympics in February 2022 signals complicity with Chinese propaganda. He does so by looking back at Hitler’s 1936 Olympics.

On the morning of Aug. 14, 1936, two NBC employees met for breakfast at a café in Berlin. Max Jordan and Bill Slater were discussing the Olympic Games they were broadcasting back to the United States – and the Nazi propaganda machine that had made their work, and their visit to Germany, somewhat unpleasant.

Slater complained about all the staged regimentation and the obviously forced smiles everywhere.

“Why don’t they revolt? We wouldn’t stand for all this browbeating and bullying in America. I know that. Why do they stand for it here?” Slater asked Jordan.

As they were talking, three armed Nazi guards sat down at the next table. The whole café quieted. “It was as though a chill had come over those present,” Jordan later recalled. “In a nutshell, there was the answer to Bill’s question.”

I included the story Max Jordan recounted in his memoir in my book on the Nazi origins of Olympic broadcasting because it perfectly encapsulated the quandary facing American sports journalists whenever the International Olympic Committee pushes them to broadcast happy images provided by repressive regimes.

It’s now less than 100 days from the opening ceremony of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, and therefore it’s time for an honest discussion about the ethics of sport journalism and the morality of American media’s complicity with authoritarian regimes that hide the active repression of their citizens.

A sign reading ‘Juden Zutritt verboten!’ forbidding entry by Jewish people to the 1936 Winter Olympics in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.

A sign reading ‘Juden Zutritt verboten!’ forbidding entry by Jewish people to the 1936 Winter Olympics in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. Photo FPG/Archive Photos/Getty Images

Abundant evidence

The world knows what China is doing right now. Courageous reporting has publicized the series of repressive domestic and international actions taken by the Chinese government over the past five years.

The persecution of the Uyghurs and other human rights abuses, the abrogation of the Hong Kong treaty along with the imposition of the Chinese government’s repression in that port city, and the prevention of a comprehensive and transparent investigation into the origins of COVID-19 are all well documented.

Thus, the Chinese government now wants good press in the West. And its efforts to ensure favorable coverage have prompted new concerns about media control and censorship during the Games, with a U.S. government spokesman recently urging Chinese government officials “not to limit freedom of movement and access for journalists and to ensure that they remain safe and able to report freely, including at the Olympic and the Paralympic Games.”

But, as was clear from the experience during the 1936 Olympics, if U.S. journalists go to Beijing and emphasize the beauty of its landscape, the happiness of its citizenry and its futuristic infrastructure, and fail to cover the more controversial realities in China, that would signal compliance with – and promotion of – Chinese propaganda.

This is American sports journalism’s Red Smith moment.

Politics, meet sports

On Jan. 4, 1980, Walter “Red” Smith, the veteran New York Times sports columnist, surprised his readership with his endorsement of the boycott movement against that summer’s Moscow Olympic Games. Boycott advocates were protesting the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan.

Smith’s stance was unexpected, as he had carefully sidestepped – or even ignored – many other moments he considered unhealthy political intrusion into international athletic competition. But Smith wrote that history had proved that America’s participation in the Nazi Games was a mistake – even if the great Black American runner Jesse Owens redeemed the event in public memory.

“When Americans look back to the 1936 Olympics,” Smith wrote in his famous column, “they take pleasure only in the memory of Jesse Owens’ four gold medals.” Outside of that, he admitted, “we are ashamed at having been guests at Adolf Hitler’s big party.”

Smith was an old-school sports reporter, already an old-timer in 1980 – he died in 1982. His reporting and columns reflected the influence of Grantland Rice and Paul Gallico, the giants who invented modern American sports writing in the 1920s. But there had always existed another group of sports reporters less afraid to point out obvious political unpleasantness.

For example, the great Jimmy Cannon had no problem freely peppering political references and acerbic commentary throughout his columns. Westbrook Pegler detested the Nazis and criticized them relentlessly throughout the 1936 Games. And Howard Cosell’s sharp commentaries, on such issues as Muhammad Ali’s boxing suspension in the 1960s and the political activism that erupted in 1968 in Mexico City, remain a credit to his legacy.

That Red Smith had spent decades remaining largely apolitical in public made his support for the boycott surprising. That he was only the second sports columnist to be awarded a Pulitzer Prize, and that his opinions were widely respected, gave his endorsement significant clout.

‘The one lever we have’

Smith opened the gates for others to point out the incongruity and obvious hypocrisy of celebrating the Soviet Union’s peaceful intentions while the Soviet army was invading and occupying Afghanistan. In his column, Smith quoted British Member of Parliament Neville Trotter, who led the boycott movement in Great Britain.

“This is the one lever we have to show our outrage at this naked aggression by Russia,” Trotter told Smith. “We should do all we can to reduce the Moscow Olympics to a shambles.”

One well-known and nationally respected sports journalist has explicitly and unambiguously called for boycotting the 2022 Beijing Games: Sally Jenkins. The Washington Post’s veteran columnist – who last year was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for commentary – published a scorching column plainly stating that “ignorance is no longer an excuse.”

“It was a forgivable mistake to award an Olympics to Beijing in 2008,” she wrote. “It’s unforgivable to hold one there now.”

Red Smith’s boycott column remains one of his most important and lasting examples of public service. As a media historian, I believe that those who emulate his courage today, like Sally Jenkins, will likely be remembered in the same way tomorrow.

Michael J. Socolow, Associate Professor, Communication and Journalism, University of Maine

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Guest Blog Post: Olympic Games are great for propagandists – how the lessons of Hitler’s Olympics loom over Beijing 2022