Is streaming the new a la carte cable? Or is it just more of the same?

Back in the the late 1980s, early 1990s, the television business started going through some big changes. For the first time ever, the original Big Three television networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) started changing ownership, going from the founders to new non-media company owners.

The broadcast networks of this era were essentially a  printing press for money.  They had no real competition for home entertainment. You watched what the networks put on the air, when they showed it, and you liked it.  A few people watched the relatively new Public Broadcasting System non-commercial channel, and if you were lucky you might have an independent station or two that showed old movies and reruns. But for the most part, these three networks had a monopoly on programming coming into the home.

As an illustration of this, in 1976 the average household had a choice of seven broadcast channels, the Big Three, PBS, and three indie stations.

In the late 70s, early 80s, VCRs started to become common, and people could start recording programs to watch when they wanted to. They could also rent movies as an alternative to what was being broadcast. By the late 1980s, Rupert Murdoch had the Fox Broadcast Network running on UHF broadcast stations that previously had no original programing.

With the growth of cable TV, by 1991, the Big Three networks had lost a third of their viewership to cable, VCRs and new networks. The average home had a choice of 33 cable channels. (For much more on this, see Ken Auletta’s great history of the time: Three Blind Mice: How the TV Networks Lost Their Way)

This has continued on through the growth of Direct Broadcast Satellite TV and digital cable, until we reached the point we had literally 100s of channels to choose from.

Auletta refers to this as the “earthquake in slow motion” – a massive change in the television marketplace that happened so slowly that the original broadcast networks were blindsided by it.

Unfortunately, this came with a cost. We would be watching perhaps six-to-ten of these channels on a regular basis, but we had to pay for all of them. The pipe dream people had was a la carte pricing – pay only for the channels you want. You don’t like sports? Don’t pay the $8 a month for ESPN. Don’t like conservative talk shows, don’t pay the $2 a month for Fox News.

But here’s the problem – The reason you get so many channels for your monthly subscription fee is that cable companies are mostly paying for the lead channel – Fox News, not Fox Business News; ESPN, not ESPN2, ESPN U, ESPN Classic; History Channel, not all the range Discovery Channels. The system works so that if your cable channel pays a big price for the lead channel, they get the second string ones for almost nothing.

So streaming would seem to be the way to get just what you want – Netflix for movies and Hulu for the equivalent of basic cable. But if you want all the Disney/20th Century Fox/Marvel/Star Wars movies, you need a subscription to Disney+. And if you want all the new WarnerMedia first run movies, you need HBO Max. And now Paramount is expanding CBS All Access into a new streaming service, plus there’s Amazon Prime, and Peacock, and Discovery+ and, and, and….

And before you know it, there will be bundles of all these streaming services that starts looking a lot like cable. If we go back to my Seven Secrets ‘They’ Don’t Want You To Know About The Media, we get to:

This post was prompted by Dr. Amber Hutchins tweeting about Disney+ show WandaVision:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Is streaming the new a la carte cable? Or is it just more of the same?

Questions Worth Asking (Maybe)

Why did it take so long for Quaker Oats to abandon Aunt Jemima as a pancake brand?


What does it take for a commentator to get fired from Fox?

I’m not certain, but apparently Lou Dobbs crossed that line.


With Oscar season approaching, was the filmed version of Hamilton a movie?

Golden Globe considers it a movie musical. What should the Academy think?


Will social media companies ever step back from having algorithms push users to maximum engagement?

Apple CEO Tim Cook thinks they need to.


And finally… How did people handle having a whole bunch of documents on their desks in the pre-computer era?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Questions Worth Asking (Maybe)

Bernie and his Mittens

With all of the awful news over the last few weeks, from the more than 400,000 people dead from the pandemic, to people out of work, to the insurrection attack on the U.S. Capitol, we’ve really needed something wonderful as a distraction online instead of the latest horror. The memes based on the mittens Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders wore to the Biden inauguration on Wednesday have provided that relief. When Bernie entered the congressional seating wearing his parka, paper mask, and an incredible pair of mittens, every eye instantly turned to him. And since then, there have been literally hundreds of meme images popping up everywhere we turn.

The best thing about these memes is that most of them are completely apolitical and kind spirited. They have nothing to do with what Bernie’s politics but everything about who he is.  Here’s the back story on Bernie and his mittens along with a number of my favorite images.

Hayat Miyazaki’s anime classic Spirited Away

Nope, Scene at the Signing of the Constitution is by Howard Chandler Christy, not John Trumble.

Several from Jeremy Littau, including Bernie at the Jedi Council.

And where would we be without Baby Yoda?

And we would be incomplete without Margaret Bourke-White’s classic photo.

The cover of Rosanne Cash’s classic King’s Record Shop

And Bernie was absolutely part of the fellowship.

I love that Bernie left his chair outside of the Nighthawk’s diner.

Bernie at Hopper's Nighthawks

And Bernie did have to be in The Room Where it Happened.

Bernie at the room where it happened

My Dear Wife said that there had to be one with Bernie with Dogs Playing Poker. She was right, of course.

And finally, here’s Bernie and his mittens hanging out with University of Nebraska at Kearney’s very own poet Don Welch.

Bernie with UNK's Don Welch

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bernie and his Mittens

“Will we be extremists for hate or for love?” Dr. King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail

" One of the greatest honors of my life was being invited to speak at the Martin Luther King, Jr. candlelight vigil several years ago at the UNK student union, along with KevinThe question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice?... The nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr National Museum of African American History & Culture

One of the greatest honors of my life was being invited to speak at the Martin Luther King, Jr. candlelight vigil several years ago at the UNK student union, along with Kevin Chaney, who was then UNK’s women’s basketball coach. 

This year’s UNK observance is at noon Monday at the Bell Tower. Attendees are asked to wear masks and maintain social distance.

Here’s what I had to say about Dr. King when I spoke:

Visalli-11-10-13When we think of public relations, we think of a professional in a suit trying to persuade us about something related to a large corporation. But not all PR is practiced by big business.

Civil rights leader The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had a brilliant understanding of public relations during the campaign to desegregate Birmingham, Alabama in 1963.

The goal of the campaign was to have non-violent demonstrations and resistance to force segregated businesses to open up to African Americans. What King, and the members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, wanted to do was stage a highly visible demonstration that would not only force change in Birmingham, but also grab the attention of the entire American public.

King and his colleagues picked Birmingham because it was one of he most segregated cities in America and because it had Eugene “Bull” Conner as police commissioner.

Conner was a racist who could be counted on to attack the peaceful marchers. Birmingham was a city where black protestors were thrown in jail, and the racists were bombing homes and churches. There was a black neighborhood that had so many bombings it came to be known as Dynamite Hill.

Dr. King and his colleagues had planned demonstrations and boycotts in Birmingham, but held off with them in order to let the political system and negotiations work. But time passed, and nothing changed. Signs were still up at the lunch counters and water fountains, and protestors were still headed to jail.

King and the rest of the SCLC needed to get attention for the plight of African Americans in cities like Birmingham.

They needed to do more than fight back against the racism of segregation. They needed to get Americans of good will in all the churches and synagogues to hear their voices.

Starting in April of 1963, predominantly African American volunteers would march in the streets, hold sit-ins at segregated lunch counters, and boycott local businesses in Birmingham. As the protests started, so did the arrests.

On Good Friday, King and Abernathy joined in the marching so that they would be arrested. While King was in jail, he was given a copy of the Birmingham News, in which there was an article where white Alabama clergy urged the SCLC to stop the demonstrations and boycotts and allow the courts to solve the problem of segregation.

But King was tired of waiting, and so he wrote what would become one of the great statements of the civil rights cause. One that spoke to people who were fundamentally their friends, not their enemies. This came to be known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail.

Writing the letter was not easy. Dr. King wrote it in the margins of the newspaper. He wrote it on scraps of note paper. He wrote it on panels of toilet paper. (Think about what the toilet paper was like if Dr. King was able to write on it!)

The letter spoke to the moderates who were urging restraint. To them, he wrote:

“My Dear Fellow Clergymen:

While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and untimely.” Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas…. But since I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try to answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms.”

He went on the acknowledge that perhaps he was an extremist, but that he was an extremist for love, not for hate:

“But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label.

Was not Jesus an extremist for love: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.”

Was not Amos an extremist for justice: “Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream.” …

Was not Martin Luther an extremist: “Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God.” …

And Abraham Lincoln: “This nation cannot survive half slave and half free.”

And Thomas Jefferson: “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal . . .”

So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love?”

King’s jailhouse writings were smuggled out and published as a brochure. His eloquent words were given added force for being written in jail. As he says toward the end of his letter, it is very different to send a message from jail than from a hotel room:

“Never before have I written so long a letter. I’m afraid it is much too long to take your precious time. I can assure you that it would have been much shorter if I had been writing from a comfortable desk, but what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell, other than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers?”

Once King was released from jail eight days later, he and his followers raised the stakes. No longer would adults be marching and being arrested, children would become the vanguard. And as the children marched, photographers and reporters from around the world would document these young people being attacked by dogs, battered by water from fire hoses, and filling up the Birmingham jails.

King faced criticism for allowing the young people to face the dangers of marching in Birmingham. But he responded by criticizing the white press, asking the reporters where they had been “during the centuries when our segregated social system had been misusing and abusing Negro children.”

Although there was rioting in Birmingham, and King’s brother’s house was bombed, the campaign was ultimately successful. Business owners took down the signs that said “WHITE” and “COLORED” from the drinking fountains and bathrooms, and anyone was allowed to eat at the lunch counters. The successful protest in Birmingham set the stage for the March on Washington that would take place in August of 1963, where King would give his famous “I have a dream” speech.

We are now more than fifty years from King’s letter from Birmingham Jail. This letter was not one of his “feel good” speeches. It doesn’t raise the spirit the way his “I have a dream” speech did.

But it did give us a message that still matters more than ever today:

 “I hope this letter finds you strong in the faith. I also hope that circumstances will soon make it possible for me to meet each of you, not as an integrationist or a civil-rights leader but as a fellow clergyman and a Christian brother. Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear drenched communities, and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all their scintillating beauty.”

Posted in Chapter 12 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on “Will we be extremists for hate or for love?” Dr. King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail

Stories of hope from the insurrection, Part 6

The violent insurrection in Washington, D.C.  Wednesday was both utterly predictable and unimaginable. My feelings about those events go well beyond the scope of this blog, so instead of laying out my feelings, I’m going to share a variety of responses to how our media responded to these events over the next few days.


While there have been endless dark stories coming out of last week’s insurrection in Washington, D.C., there have also been some positive signs coming forward as well. People standing up for what is right, companies trying to uphold public civility, moments of grace. Here are a few things that have given me hope:


C-SPAN gives us live, uninterrupted by commentary, coverage of the debates in congress over how to respond to last week’s events. When so much of cable news becomes a shout-fest that ignores what is actually being said, C-SPAN is a breath of fresh air. Actually hear what both Republicans and Democrats are saying:

I don’t always want to hear everything, but when I do, C-SPAN is the place for it.


Commentators who take the long view on current issues. For example, journalism prof Michael Socolow wrote about how preserving net neutrality would be a force for expanded free speech… 14 years ago.


Actor/former Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger sent out a heart-felt message on how an Austrian immigrant reacted to last week’s violence.  While some of what he says is a bit tone-deaf, it is refreshing to hear a celeb making a thoughtful response that lasts more than 30 seconds.


And finally, my favorite story from last week – the story about New Jersey Rep. Andy Kim getting down on his hands and knees after the attack on the Capitol to pick up all the trash left in the rotunda. Instead of making privileged complaints about metal detectors, he was physically cleaning up the mess left behind by the rioters. What a model for a public servant who remembers the service part of his job.

Posted in Chapter 14, Chapter 6, Chapter 9 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Stories of hope from the insurrection, Part 6

Front Pages: Stories from the insurrection, Part 5

The violent insurrection in Washington, D.C.  Wednesday was both utterly predictable and unimaginable. My feelings about those events go well beyond the scope of this blog, so instead of laying out my feelings, I’m going to share a variety of responses to how our media responded to these events over the next few days.


There was a lot of talk about what words should or should not be used in headlines about Wednesday’s riots/insurrection/attack on the capitol. The term “mob” became popular relatively quickly, but the term “protestors” and “supporters” also saw quite a bit of ink.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, however, went all in with their headline:

Here’s a collection of several other front pages:

The New York tabloids were predictably tabloidy, but even the Murdoch-owned New York Post took a hard stand (in a Post kind of way) on the rioters with Friday’s cover:

Unsurprisingly, the progressive NY Daily News was pretty blunt with their cover:


And finally, the cover of next week’s New Yorker:


Coming soon: Reactions from around the world, and stories of hope from dark times.

Posted in Chapter 14, Chapter 5 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Front Pages: Stories from the insurrection, Part 5

Newspaper Editorials: Stories from the insurrection, Part 4

The violent insurrection in Washington, D.C.  Wednesday was both utterly predictable and unimaginable. My feelings about those events go well beyond the scope of this blog, so instead of laying out my feelings, I’m going to share a variety of responses to how our media responded to these events over the next few days.


It’s been striking seeing newspapers calling from President Trump to resign. We saw editorials calling for Nixon to resign during the Watergate era, and these often came from newspapers that had supported him in the past, such as the LA Times and the Omaha World-Herald. There was also editorial support for resignation when President Clinton was impeached for lying about an extramarital affair.

Here are a number of editorials from around the nation reacting to Wednesday’s events.  The first one here, however, is by far the most surprising – The Wall Street Journal. This paper has one of the most conservative editorial pages in the country and is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.

More to be expected were editorials from the Washington Post, the first calling for Trump’s removal from office, the second for some form of punishment:

While the NY Times has had a range of editorials about Wednesday’s riots, one of the most powerful states, “No Americans should have to lose their lives to a transition of presidential power.”


Coming soon: Front pages, reactions from around the world, and stories of hope from dark times.

Posted in Chapter 14, Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Newspaper Editorials: Stories from the insurrection, Part 4

What does the 1st Amendment mean? Stories from the the insurrection, Part 3

The violent insurrection in Washington, D.C.  Wednesday was both utterly predictable and unimaginable. My feelings about those events go well beyond the scope of this blog, so instead of laying out my feelings, I’m going to share a variety of responses to how our media responded to these events over the next few days.


Following Donald Trump’s tweets on Wednesday that were widely seen as inciting violence in Washington, D.C., the social media company went beyond labeling his tweets and actually blocked three of them and suspended the president’s personal account for 12 hours. Twitter also announced that any future violations of Twitter Safety policies would result in the president being permanently banned from his favorite social media service.

Following this warning, The Washington Post reports Trump continued to challenge Twitter’s policies against hate speech and inciting violence. These tweets led Twitter to permanently ban the president from their platform.

 

On Thursday, Mark Zuckerberg announced that the president had been blocked from Facebook indefinitely because “the risks of allowing President Trump to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great….”


On a slightly different note, major publisher Simon & Schuster announced that they were dropping their contract for a book from Missouri Senator Josh Hawley, who was one of the leading voices in the U.S. Senate for throwing out the electoral votes for President Elect Joe Biden.

Sen. Hawley claimed this contract cancellation was a “direct assault on the First Amendment.”

This, of course, is nonsense. The only thing Sen. Hawley was being denied was a big paycheck. Anyone who wants to can self-publish through a wide range of services such as Amazon Kindle.  You can even get paid for it if people are willing to buy your book. No one is silencing him. Simon & Schuster just doesn’t want to pay the senator for writing a book.

A former editor of mine wrote on Twitter in response to Sen. Hawley:

By the way “only approved speech can now be published” is how publishing houses are *supposed* to work and is exactly why editors exist in the first place. We try not to sign up authors who go on to become an international embarrassment.


As Sen. Hawley and President Trump demonstrate, there’s a lot of confusion as to what the First Amendment does or does not guarantee. While a full discussion of that topic could occupy a semester-long class, let’s look at it at three levels.

1 – Local TV reporter/anchor Steve White gives a good basic summary:

2 – Media scholar and sometimes WaPo commentator Michael Socolow adds a bit more depth to the topic and reminds us that this isn’t just about social media platforms:

3 – If you want to really go down the rabbit hole of the implications of what Twitter and Facebook have done, the legal-issue Twitter account @Popehat has quite a bit to say about the topic.


The one thing that really does concern me about President Trump having his Twitter account removed is that it takes away a long record of what he had to say, inflammatory and otherwise. Fortunately, there are at least two comprehensive archives of the president’s tweets.


Tomorrow – Headlines and editorials about Wednesday’s riots. (Assuming something else doesn’t break overnight to replace that topic!)

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 13, Chapter 5, Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on What does the 1st Amendment mean? Stories from the the insurrection, Part 3

Words Matter: Stories from the insurrection, Part 2

The violent insurrection in Washington, D.C.  Wednesday was both utterly predictable and unimaginable. My feelings about those events go well beyond the scope of this blog, so instead of laying out my feelings, I’m going to share a variety of responses to how our media responded to these events over the next few days.


Reporters & photographers put their lives on the line to bring us the news

A harrowing account from three NY Times journalists on what they experienced covering the assault on the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday. Staff photographer Erin Schaff writes:

Suddenly, two or three men in black surrounded me and demanded to know who I worked for.

Grabbing my press pass, they saw that my ID said The New York Times and became really angry. They threw me to the floor, trying to take my cameras. I started screaming for help as loudly as I could. No one came. People just watched. At this point, I thought I could be killed and no one would stop them. They ripped one of my cameras away from me, broke a lens on the other and ran away….

But then the police found me. I told them that I was a photojournalist and that my pass had been stolen, but they didn’t believe me. They drew their guns, pointed them and yelled at me to get down on my hands and knees. As I lay on the ground, two other photojournalists came into the hall and started shouting “She’s a journalist!”


The reporting team from Politico tells the story of their Wednesday at the Capitol

Politico had five reporters and a photographer in the Capitol Wednesday along with two more reporters outside. This is their first person account of their day in roughly chronological order. This is what journalism is about.


Non-profit journalism group ProPublica shows their work on why Wednesday’s attack was not a surprise

Why were capitol police and other DC security forces so woefully unprepared for Wednesday’s violence? Well, it wasn’t because they couldn’t have found out about it in advance. In the following tweets, the non-profit (and Pulitzer Prize-winning) journalism organization ProPublica shows their work on what they knew in advance.


Tomorrow – Headlines and editorials about Wednesday’s riots. (Actually, getting banned from social media and the First Amendment, because news keeps happening!)

Posted in Chapter 6 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Words Matter: Stories from the insurrection, Part 2

Words Matter – Thoughts on Wednesday’s Insurrection, Part 1

The violent insurrection in Washington, D.C.  Wednesday was both utterly predictable and unimaginable. My feelings about those events go well beyond the scope of this blog, so instead of laying out my feelings, I’m going to share a variety of responses to how our media responded to these events over the next couple of days.


A lot of us were glued to our TV sets Wednesday

Once I realized what was happening a bit after lunch on Wednesday, I was worthless for the rest of the day.  I was glued to the various news channels and web sites.  Eventually, in the evening, we tried to take a break to watch an old Humphrey Bogart movie, but calls from family kept coming in to bring the discussion back to the riots.


Wednesday was a really tough day for journalists

Journalists worked very hard Wednesday in a hostile environment where the rioters were actively threatening members of the media. UNK grad and award-winning Washington Post food writer had this to say about the work of his colleagues covering the rioting and attacks at the capitol:


These threats and attacks are nothing new.  

Paul Gillespie, one of the survivors of the Annapolis Capital Gazette massacre in 2018, sent out this thread in memory of his fallen colleagues yesterday.


What does the aftermath of Wednesday’s insurrection look like in the Capitol building? 

Some incredible photography in this thread from NBC News correspondent Leigh Ann Caldwell. (Goes on much longer than what I included here.) This was vandalism on a massive scale.


Fox News didn’t quite know how to handle this story

As CNN media reporter Brian Stelter pointed out in his book Hoax, Fox News comes (sometimes) in two different flavors. At night, when it gets by far its biggest audiences, is when the opinion hosts are on. They are able to talk about and say pretty much anything they want as long as they keep drawing an audience. They aren’t required to back up anything they say with evidence. After all, they are just giving their opinions. (Even if they are making false factual claims.) This is what it looked like on Fox Wednesday night.

Then on Thursday morning, the more news oriented shows come on that more nearly match the model that Fox claims to follow – a right-leaning approach to straight news. (Though the show Fox and Friends has some strong elements of the evening programing and used to be President Trump’s favorite show.)


Tomorrow – Personal stories from journalists who covered Wednesday’s violence and how journalists knew about the potential for violence in advance.

Posted in Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Words Matter – Thoughts on Wednesday’s Insurrection, Part 1