Cancer is one of those topics…

I discovered that today (Tuesday, Feb. 4th) is World Cancer Awareness Day from a Facebook post from a former student of mine whose wife has been been winning the battle against cancer for the last two years. Seeing that post got me checking on how long it had been since I was diagnosed with cancer.  At the time, you don’t think that you could ever reach that point where you don’t remember the year. But time heals many things. I will, however, always remember the moment the dermatologist discovered the spot of melanoma on my upper right arm. One of the scariest moments in my life.  But I’m very fortunate. My cancer was caught early and only required simple outpatient surgery.  That, and 17 years of followup visits to the skin doc.

But I honestly wasn’t sure of the year. As I was trying to dig up the date on my computer, I came across this blog post from 2006.  I thought I would share it with you today. 

Originally published October 2006

Cancer is one of those topics we just don’t want to talk about. We’ve all buried friends who have suffered from the Big C. It frightens us more than stroke or heart disease.

Nothing kills a conversation faster than someone asking, “How are you?” and you answer, “Fine, I just had cancer surgery.” That is inevitably followed by a long, awkward silence.

Unless you are my friend, Tim. When he asked about my arm being in a sling, I told him I had had a cancer removed. His response was, “Me, too!” While I just had a melanoma, Tim had colon cancer, which involved major surgery and months of chemo. But for the next several months we would go out to lunch regularly to talk about living with cancer. If he was in the midst of chemo on that day, he might take an egg salad sandwich with him to the restaurant, as that would be all he could tolerate eating. I sometimes felt like I’d had “cancer lite” since I didn’t have to have any of the icky treatments he was facing. (Four years later, Tim’s hair is thinner than it used to be, but otherwise he is well.) (Update – 14 years after I originally wrote this, Tim is still doing well.)

It rather stunned me a couple of years later when I got invited to a cancer survivors picnic at the local hospital. It’s funny, but I had never seen myself that way — as a cancer survivor, though I certainly am.

Cancer Stories book coverIn the years following my surgery, my former colleagues at WVU College of Media worked on a wonderful documentary film and book, Cancer Stories: Lessons In Love, Loss & Hope, that tells the story of how several patients and their families deal with cancer and its treatment. It doesn’t soft sell the pain and suffering (including death), but it also finds the humor and life in it as well. Best of all, it doesn’t sanitize the experience. Cancer Stories doesn’t paint a rosy picture, but it doesn’t make life seem hopeless, either. It shows that patients can get cranky during treatment and that they can crack jokes about it as well. I strongly recommend the book and documentary to everyone, but especially to those who are dealing with a diagnosis of cancer. When my colleagues were searching for a title for the book and film, my wife suggested “Cancer Sucks!” While everyone agreed the title was accurate, cooler heads prevailed in selecting a somewhat calmer title.

For myself, it’s always hard to hear another cancer story. I know that I was fortunate. I was referred to a dermatologist early enough that she was able to get all the cancer out, along with a sizable chunk of my upper arm.

Although I just passed the fourth anniversary of my surgery, I keep looking in the mirror after my shower, trying to decide if any of the hundreds of moles I have look somehow different. I’m not completely sure what I’m looking for, as the mole that was melanoma didn’t look any different to me. I will complain about having to go in for one more doctor’s appointment, and I’ll stress over the biopsy (should there be one) until the results get back.

I still have to go in for regular follow-up exams where every inch of my skin gets scrutinized. About half the time there’s a biopsy to go with the exam, when a mole doesn’t look quite right. You are supposed to get a postcard if everything is OK, and a phone call if there’s a problem. Inevitably I fall into a middle group – the tissue taken will be “atypical” but not cancerous. So it’s a phone call, but not the bad one. This time the biopsy wasn’t conclusive, so they’re going back in tomorrow for a bigger chunk of flesh off my back. Which requires me to tell my wife, “Listen to me, I don’t have cancer. They just want to take a second look at the spot on my back.” And of course, as soon as you say, “It’s not cancer,” the question comes back, “Then why do they want to look at it again?”

I am lucky. I’ve got good health insurance, good doctors, and a good family. I had treatable cancer that was caught early. I’m a cancer survivor.

It’s now 17 years since my diagnosis.  The skin doc continues to take my exams seriously, but they are now at nine month intervals for the first time since diagnosis, down from every four months and then six months. There is still a massive divot in my upper right arm where they took the melanoma out.

Earlier this week I read that radio talk host Rush Limbaugh announced he had advanced lung cancer. Many people who dislike Limbaugh’s politics have had unkind things to say about his diagnosis.  While I have no love for the man or his radio show, I agree with diabetes activist Mike Durbin who tweeted last night:

I agree with him 100 percent. I have lost friends and family to cancer. I have friends being treated for it now. No matter how you feel about someone, you never rejoice for cancer.


The following is a brilliant public service announcement called Dear 16-Year-Old Me.  I would urge all of you to watch it.

Posted in Health Issues | Tagged , | Comments Off on Cancer is one of those topics…

Twitter and the Death of a Basketball Legend

As everyone knows, basketball legend Kobe Bryant and several others, including one of his daughters, died in a helicopter crash on Sunday. Without further comment, here’s a number of Tweets that have discussed the flow of news about this tragedy. Retweeting here on the blog is not an endorsement or condemnation of anything. It’s just showing some examples of how this unfolded on social media.

I may update with new tweets as appropriate.

(Updated 1/28/20)


 

 

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 14, Chapter 5 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Twitter and the Death of a Basketball Legend

Ten Twitter Feeds Worth Following

The homework for my Commentary and Blogging class this week is for them to each make a blog post with ten interesting Twitter feeds to follow, along with a brief explanation of why each is worth paying attention to.  I thought I would do the assignment as well:

1. @jayrosen_nyu -Legendary NYU journalism professor

2. @timcarman – UNK grad and award-winning Washington Post food writer

3. @JeremyLittau – Journalism professor and Twitter public intellectual

4. @Keah_Maria – Keah Brown, author of The Cute One and creator of #DisabledAndCute hashtag

5. @ChrisDunkerLJS – Legislative & higher ed reporter for Lincoln Journal Star

6. @popmediaprof – Pop culture professor specializing in queer theory and LGBT studies

7. @DavidAFrench – Senior editor for The Dispatch and Iraq war veteran

8. @ElizKolbert – Author of The Sixth Extinction, New Yorker reporter on climate issues. If you talk about her ideas, people will not invite you back to parties.

9. @Sulliview – Margaret Sullivan, media columnist for Washington Post

10. @seungminkim – White House reporter for Washington Post

Posted in JMC 406 | Tagged , | Comments Off on Ten Twitter Feeds Worth Following

Dr. King urged us all to be extremists for love and justice, not for hate

One of the greatest honors of my life was being invited to speak at the Martin Luther King, Jr. candlelight vigil several years ago at the UNK student union, along with Kevin Chaney, who was then UNK’s women’s basketball coach. 

This year’s observance is Tuesday at 6 p.m. at the Ponderosa Room of the Nebraskan Student Union. Shavonne Washington Krauth, the Culture & Inclusion Manager at Children’s Hospital and Medical Center, will be the featured speaker with the topic “Embracing Multiple Truths and Authenticity to Cultivate Change.” If you are in the area, I urge you to attend as we honor Dr. King.

Here’s what I had to say about Dr. King when I spoke:

Visalli-11-10-13When we think of public relations, we think of a professional in a suit trying to persuade us about something related to a large corporation. But not all PR is practiced by big business.

Civil rights leader The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had a brilliant understanding of public relations during the campaign to desegregate Birmingham, Alabama in 1963.

The goal of the campaign was to have non-violent demonstrations and resistance to force segregated businesses to open up to African Americans. What King, and the members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, wanted to do was stage a highly visible demonstration that would not only force change in Birmingham, but also grab the attention of the entire American public.

King and his colleagues picked Birmingham because it was one of he most segregated cities in America and because it had Eugene “Bull” Conner as police commissioner.

Conner was a racist who could be counted on to attack the peaceful marchers. Birmingham was a city where black protestors were thrown in jail, and the racists were bombing homes and churches. There was a black neighborhood that had so many bombings it came to be known as Dynamite Hill.

Dr. King and his colleagues had planned demonstrations and boycotts in Birmingham, but held off with them in order to let the political system and negotiations work. But time passed, and nothing changed. Signs were still up at the lunch counters and water fountains, and protestors were still headed to jail.

King and the rest of the SCLC needed to get attention for the plight of African Americans in cities like Birmingham.

They needed to do more than fight back against the racism of segregation. They needed to get Americans of good will in all the churches and synagogues to hear their voices.

Starting in April of 1963, predominantly African American volunteers would march in the streets, hold sit-ins at segregated lunch counters, and boycott local businesses in Birmingham. As the protests started, so did the arrests.

On Good Friday, King and Abernathy joined in the marching so that they would be arrested. While King was in jail, he was given a copy of the Birmingham News, in which there was an article where white Alabama clergy urged the SCLC to stop the demonstrations and boycotts and allow the courts to solve the problem of segregation.

But King was tired of waiting, and so he wrote what would become one of the great statements of the civil rights cause. One that spoke to people who were fundamentally their friends, not their enemies. This came to be known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail.

Writing the letter was not easy. Dr. King wrote it in the margins of the newspaper. He wrote it on scraps of note paper. He wrote it on panels of toilet paper. (Think about what the toilet paper was like if Dr. King was able to write on it!)

The letter spoke to the moderates who were urging restraint. To them, he wrote:

“My Dear Fellow Clergymen:

While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and untimely.” Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas…. But since I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try to answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms.”

He went on the acknowledge that perhaps he was an extremist, but that he was an extremist for love, not for hate:

“But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label.

Was not Jesus an extremist for love: “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.”

Was not Amos an extremist for justice: “Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream.” …

Was not Martin Luther an extremist: “Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God.” …

And Abraham Lincoln: “This nation cannot survive half slave and half free.”

And Thomas Jefferson: “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal . . .”

So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love?”

King’s jailhouse writings were smuggled out and published as a brochure. His eloquent words were given added force for being written in jail. As he says toward the end of his letter, it is very different to send a message from jail than from a hotel room:

“Never before have I written so long a letter. I’m afraid it is much too long to take your precious time. I can assure you that it would have been much shorter if I had been writing from a comfortable desk, but what else can one do when he is alone in a narrow jail cell, other than write long letters, think long thoughts and pray long prayers?”

Once King was released from jail eight days later, he and his followers raised the stakes. No longer would adults be marching and being arrested, children would become the vanguard. And as the children marched, photographers and reporters from around the world would document these young people being attacked by dogs, battered by water from fire hoses, and filling up the Birmingham jails.

King faced criticism for allowing the young people to face the dangers of marching in Birmingham. But he responded by criticizing the white press, asking the reporters where they had been “during the centuries when our segregated social system had been misusing and abusing Negro children.”

Although there was rioting in Birmingham, and King’s brother’s house was bombed, the campaign was ultimately successful. Business owners took down the signs that said “WHITE” and “COLORED” from the drinking fountains and bathrooms, and anyone was allowed to eat at the lunch counters. The successful protest in Birmingham set the stage for the March on Washington that would take place in August of 1963, where King would give his famous “I have a dream” speech.

We are now more than fifty years from King’s letter from Birmingham Jail. This letter was not one of his “feel good” speeches. It doesn’t raise the spirit the way his “I have a dream” speech did.

But it did give us a message that still matters more than ever today:

 “I hope this letter finds you strong in the faith. I also hope that circumstances will soon make it possible for me to meet each of you, not as an integrationist or a civil-rights leader but as a fellow clergyman and a Christian brother. Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear drenched communities, and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all their scintillating beauty.”

Posted in Chapter 12 | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Guest Blog Post: Little Women Spoiler Alert

This guest blog post is from my Dear Wife, author Pam Andrews Hanson.  In the past she has blogged here and here. Needless to say, this guest blog post contains Little Women spoilers.

The March sisters from Greta Gerwig’s 2019 version of Little women.

Spoiler Alert: Beth dies in Little Women and women still face an uphill battle to make their voices heard.

In light of the Oscar snub of Little Women director Greta Gerwig, it feels anticlimactic to dwell on the death of fictional Beth. However, my well-read husband’s reaction to this March sister’s passing — as in he DID NOT KNOW — speaks volumes, literary and otherwise, about what we talk about when we talk about beloved books from our youth.

Or maybe don’t talk about?

I was dumbfounded when we left the movie theater after viewing this latest version of the Louisa May Alcott classic to learn the death of Beth came as a complete shock to my spouse. After all this this book is part of “literary canon.”  In all fairness, I had to confess I forgot the particulars of the affairs of the heart.

But the demise of Beth ranks right up there with monumental moments in great books. Or so I thought. The plot thickened when, after non-stop ribbing from me, Ralph posted on social media asking if he was the only one around who didn’t know Beth died.

This prompted a flurry of comments (with one aside about Beth in the Kiss song) from younger women who hadn’t read the book yet but were planning to and to see the movie. Our voracious reader daughter-in-law could not believe my husband, who goes to great lengths in person and on social media to avoid movie spoilers of any kind, was spouting a spoiler. She said her friends read Little Women but she hadn’t yet.

So down came the spoiler.

Lady BirdThen out come the Oscar nominees. Greta Gerwig (whose Lady Bird I adored) is nominated for a writing award and her movie is tabbed for Best Picture but no directing award for her?

In a sea of testosterone-laden 2019 (a couple of which my husband really liked, a couple he was indifferent to),  Ralph’s favorite movies this awards-eligible year were the documentary Apollo 11, the dramedy The Farewell and the sailing documentary Maiden, followed closely by Little Women.

I have stopped giving him grief for not being on top of 150+-year-old popular culture. And we had the continuation of a decades-long lively conversation about favorite books from our  younger days.

I loved Little Women, the Nancy Drew series, any biography of ‘famous’ women I could get my hands on (which was a pitiful few), The Witch of Blackbird Pond, on the list goes on and on. I didn’t read the Hardy Boys. Not my cuppa.

My mother-in-law read all the Little House books out loud to my husband and his siblings as they went on long car trips. They felt a particular connection to the stories as Ralph’s grandfather homesteaded out in North Dakota. My husband did confess his favorite of that series was Farmer Boy because it was all about the food. Ralph read endless pages of science fiction and fantasy. I couldn’t get enough of mysteries.

I would have devoured J.K. Rowling and Rick Riordan in my youth, (and  Ralph and I both did as adults).

Apparently during all these years of marriage and movie going and book reading, we never talked about the March sisters: Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy.

Someone needs to talk to the boys’ club in Hollywood about Greta, Lulu, and Marielle.

 

Posted in Chapter 4, Chapter 8, Guest Blog Post | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Guest Blog Post: Little Women Spoiler Alert

My Year In Movies – Some Thoughts on the Oscars

I didn’t get My Year in Movies blog post up yet, and the Oscar nominations just got announced this morning, so I guess I will combine the two into a single commentary.

When I saw the list of Oscar nominations this morning, my first thought was, “If you want Oscar nominations, make a manly film about manly men. Don’t even think about making a film about womenfolk…”

I mean, Joker, which tells the story of a comic book villain’s descent into madness gets 11 nominations; Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon A Time in Hollywood, a tribute to a fictionalized 1960s got 10, as did Martin Scorsese’s epic mob drama The Irishman, and the creatively shot WW I film 1917. Now I’m not dissing all of these films by any means.  Once Upon A Time was one of my favorite films of the year, and I’m looking forward to seeing 1917here in Kearney later this week. But the one thing these movies all have in common is a massive overdose of testosterone.

I have no particular objection to manly films.  I agree whole heartedly with Alyssa Rosenberg’s discussion of the virtues of Ford vs. Ferrari, a rather masculine film that I loved. It’s one of my favorite racing films that told a great story of the battle of car builder Carroll Shelby (Matt Damon) and driver Ken Miles (Christian Bale) who have a problematic relationship and yet are united in trying to beat the Italian Ferrari. The film also has a surprising nuanced relationship between Miles and his wife, played by Irish actress Caitriona Balfe.

But, let’s look at some of my other favorite movies of the year.

I thought Little Women was one of the most enjoyable and interesting movies I saw all year.  And I say this as someone who had never read Little Women, nor did I know its most famous plot point. While much of the acting in it was spot on (especially from Florence Pugh who plays the difficult sister, Amy), this is clearly a film that belongs to director/screenwriter Greta Gerwig.  She got a well deserved best adapted screenplay nomination, but no nod for best director. She tells the story assuredly with a current and historic timeline that brought a new storytelling convention to a 150-year-old story.

Singer/songwriter Amy Speace, writing on Facebook today, had this to say about Gerwig’s work on Little Women:

I mean: talk about a tall mountain to climb. And she did it with originality and it was gorgeously shot which means gorgeously directed and there were GREAT performances which means she was an amazing director AND the screenplay?? I mean: what’s a freaking woman gotta do? Personally, I thought it was a way better film than “Hollywood”. And I liked Joker a lot but not as much as Little Women…

Even more unforgivable was the complete neglect of nominations for the Chinese/American film The Farewell that tells a starkly original story of an immigrant family in the US having to deal with a pending death back in China. The family goes home to China to visit grandma, but they are not allowed to tell Grandma she is dying. Actress/comedian Awkwafina displays enormous depth as the granddaughter of the apparently dying grandmother.  There was also no Oscar love for writer/director Lulu Wang who based the film on her own family’s experience. And how can you resist a movie with the tag line “Based on a true lie”?

I cannot understand how Apollo 11 did not get a nomination for best documentary.  Released on the 50th anniversary year of the first moon landing, it tells the story of the Apollo 11 flight with all period footage, much of from previously unseen 70mm film footage.  Telling the story with nothing but sound and images from the time made it fascinating, telling it with large amounts of new footage and sound made it fantastic. Here’s a link to the review I wrote when the movie first came out.

Another documentary featuring “found footage” that I really enjoyed was Maiden, the story of the first all-female crew to enter the Whitbread Cup round-the-world sailing race. The boat’s name was Maiden, and the film features a wide collection of footage shot at the time of the 1989 race. Captain Tracy Edwards was in her 20s and had only been a cook in a previous running of the race. Unlike Apollo 11, Maiden was not a big commercial success, but it was a great story of adventure on the high seas.

Finally, I really enjoyed Blinded By The Light, a movie about the universality of the appeal and meaning of Bruce Springsteen’s music; based on the real-life experience a Pakistani young man growing up in Britain.

Not showing up on my list are Avengers: Endgame, Captain Marvel, or Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, and the like.  I enjoyed them all.  But truth be told, as much as I love science fiction and adventure films, I’m getting a little tired of overly long, overly produced event movies.

I have yet to see 1917, Ready or Not, and Parasite, two of which I’m planning to see this week.

Posted in Chapter 8 | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

2019 in Media – When the chicken sandwich wars go viral

In retrospect, we all should have seen it coming.

We should have guessed that one of the biggest social media battles of the year would be a corporate fight over … chicken sandwiches.

The Chick-fil-A chicken sandwich empire has long had connections to social conservatism.  And while the company founder’s connection to evangelical causes and “closed on Sunday” business model has brought it criticism, those same factors have made it a  favorite on the political and religious  right. (Along with all the people who simply like their sandwiches.)

On my own college campus, there was a bit of a dust up nearly four years ago when conservative activist news sites made a huge deal out of the restaurant being “banned” from the University of Nebraska Student Union.  Nothing of the sort happened, of course; there was simply a discussion going on as to what fast food restaurant Lopers wanted added to their student union. After all the fuss, Chick-fil-A has a been a popular lunch spot on campus for the last year. (You can get the back story here.)

While there has long been talk about boycotts of the sandwich slinger from progressives, I’ve long believed that the company has benefited more from being the signature fast food for conservatives than from being hurt by critiques from the left. (I would suspect that progressives rarely have favorite large corporations…)

So Chick-fil-A has long been the default winner in the battle of the chicken sandwiches.  Despite massive corporate efforts, McDonalds has not been able to create a break-out chicken product since the ubiquitous Chicken McNuggets went national back in 1983.

Kentucky Fried Chicken has the most stores of mass-market chicken cooks, but they have always been known much more for their bone-in and strips than for their sandwiches. (Note that while there are more KFC stores, Chick-fil-A sells a lot more chicken.)

The  same was true of my personal favorite – Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, until the summer of 2019.

Da. Da. Dum…. (That sounds ominous)

Popeyes, despite having a white founder, has long had soul food sensibilities and has long been built around the concept of spicy chicken. On Aug. 12, 2019, Popeye’s introduced their chicken sandwich, available in both spicy and regular forms, to the world, and the world went crazy, with hours long lines extending out the doors of every restaurant. Chick-fil-A could not let this shot on their bow pass, and so as a proper 21st century company, they tweeted out:

To which Popeye’s responded with a rather cheeky retweet:

Notice the differences in response – Chick-fil-A as of this writing got 23,000 likes, while Popeye’s response go 320,000. It even generated a visit from the Distracted Boyfriend:

The Popeyes sandwich proved to be so popular that before the end of the month, the company had sold out of the product. But the social media battle didn’t really quiet down.  At one point, Popeyes suggested to customers they could bring a bun to the restaurant and place a pair of chicken strips into it.

Popeyes brought the sandwich back to the market on Nov. 3, 2019 – National Sandwich Day, which happened to be on a Sunday (when its rival is closed).

Chick-fil-A had plans for celebrating National Sandwich Day before belatedly realizing what day it was.

In mid-November, Chick-fil-A surprised both supporters and critics by announcing that their charitable foundation was going to change its giving pattern and no longer contribute to a pair of charities that had been perceived as anti-LGBTQ. Much of the response to this change came from the political right who viewed the new policy as a betrayal of the company’s conservative supporters. Typical was the response from former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee:

Other players in the fast food battlefield have tried to rise to relevance through all of this, with McD’s trying for a Chick-fil-A sandwich clone in a pair of markets, received only minimal attention.

Wendy’s sassy Twitter account generated a fair amount of notice a couple of years ago when then 16-year-old Carter Wilkerson got the chain to give him free chicken nuggets for a year when he got a tweet about the crispy product shared more than 3.6 million times, setting a record for Twitter.

An important thing to remember through all of this is that the whole chicken sandwich wars are primarily about telling a story about something that is easy to buy and enjoy. It’s not really about the food. (HINT: If you like chicken sandwiches, you will likely enjoy both Chick-fil-A’s and Popeyes’ offerings.  McD’s? You’re on your own there…)

David Portalatin, a food industry analyst, told The Washington Post, “This whole thing is not about chicken sandwiches. It’s about the virality of the story. And it’s a reflection of the performance of chains like Chick-fil-A.”


And finallya bit of an uplifting story in the battle over fried chicken sandwiches. As the narrative over the Popeyes sandwich was escalating last summer, musician Bri Hall responded by tweeting about the Washington, D.C. restaurant the Roaming Rooster’s chicken sandwich.  Her tweet went viral, bringing in long lines for the restaurant and its four food trucks.  Roaming Rooster, owned by an Ethiopian immigrant, repaid Bri with a promise of free chicken for life.

Posted in Chapter 1, Chapter 10 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 2019 in Media – When the chicken sandwich wars go viral

LMM News Part 2 (sort of): Hamilton, impeachment and the current news cycle

I started tweeting about Alexander Hamilton and impeachment this morning as a way of avoiding working on my end-of-the semester grading, and it kind of got out of control.  Here it is in mildly more coherent form:

Artwork of Alexander Hamilton and President Trump from Pep Montserrat for The Washington Post

Pep Montserrat for The Washington Post

It all started this morning when I was reading the Washington Post’s morning newsletter The Daily 202 that carried the headline “Alexander Hamilton has been cast in a starring role for impeachment’s closing arguments.” (I might also note that it came with a fantastic bit of artwork by Pep Montserrat.) In it, Post journalist James Hohmann writes, using an abundance of references to the Hamilton musical, about how politicians of both the Republican and Democratic persuasion have been using the nation’s first treasury secretary and defender of the constitution to talk about the impeachment of President Trump.

Most of the talk has come Hamilton’s work on the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays written by Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay in defense of the U.S. Constitution.  (If you want to actually see the original text, Congress’s web site has a good on-line version of them.) And while Hamilton (and Madison’s and Jay’s) writings are as germane today as ever, there’s no question that Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton musical is a big part of what we are paying so much attention to the first treasury secretary.

https://youtu.be/o78c23qSR4g

As a side note, Lin-Manuel Miranda, who wrote and starred in the musical Hamilton, told The New York Post (a newspaper co-founded by Hamilton!) that it never occurred to him that his musical would be so big. “I thought it would be popular with teachers, and I hoped it would appeal to hip-hop fans and musical theater fans alike, [but] I never anticipated how it would catch on with people in power, and how often I hear politicians and people who work in DC quoting the show,” Miranda told the NY Post.

Lin-Manuel Miranda performs with the cast of “Hamilton” at the 2016 Tony Awards.

But I think there’s one more reason I can think of for Alexander Hamilton to come to the forefront right now. Hohmann, writing for The Daily 202, said that Hamilton never got to be president because he was killed in a duel. While that is certainly true, Hamilton’s political career was over much earlier for a range of reasons.

Among the reasons Hamilton was never president was because he paid hush money to cover an affair he had with Mariah Reynolds. When his political enemies found out about the payments, they initially assumed they had to do with evidence of improper currency speculation. Hamilton responded by publishing  The Reynold’s Pamphlet — an exhaustive documentation of his affair and subsequent blackmail payments. That pamphlet, I think, is one of the reasons he never became president. (That and the so-called Adams Pamphlet that attacked President John Adams from his own party.)

Anyway, James Hohmann has a great news commentary in the Washington Post today, but keep in mind the rest of the story.

And finally… when people say that political times have never been this bad before, just remember there was a time when the sitting vice president gunned down the former treasury secretary in a duel.  So far we don’t have that happening… Yet, anyway.

The duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton at Weedhawken, N.J.

Posted in Chapter 6, Chapter 7 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on LMM News Part 2 (sort of): Hamilton, impeachment and the current news cycle

Lin-Manuel Miranda News Part 1: In The Heights finally makes the trip from Broadway to Hollywood

(UPDATE: 5/12/20 – The release of film adaptation of In The Heights has been delayed until the summer of 2021 because movie theaters have been closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Though I wouldn’t be shocked if it ended up landing on Disney+ before then…) 

Before Lin-Manuel Miranda became a household name for writing and starring in the hit musical Hamilton, before he was nominated for an Oscar for music from the Pixar movie Moana, before he was a supporting character in the movie Mary Poppins Returns or the HBO series His Dark Materials… 

Before all these things, Lin-Manuel Miranda wrote and starred in a  hip hop/Latin musical called In The Heights based on the New York neighborhood he grew up in – Washington Heights.

The show was a big hit, running on Broadway from 2008 – 2011 and winning four Tony awards, including Best Musical.

Lin-Manuel Miranda and the Broadway cast of In The Heights from the 2008 Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.

The development of a movie version of In The Heights seemed inevitable, especially with the subsequent phenomenal popularity of Hamilton. But there was a holdup because the film rights were held by the Weinstein Co., which was driven into bankruptcy by the numerous sexual harassment allegations and criminal charges against movie producer Harvey Weinstein. But when the bankrupt studio failed to put Heights into production by 2017, the rights reverted to Miranda and the show’s playwright Quiara Alegría Hudes. Warner Bros. reportedly paid $50 million for the rights to the play.

The movie, directed by Crazy Rich Asians Jon M. Chu, is slated for release in the summer of 2020, and the trailer for it just dropped earlier this week. And I could not be more excited about a new movie musical.

Here’s the trailer:

And finally:

Here’s a BroadwayCon panel from 2018 on In The Heights

Part 1

Part 2

Posted in Chapter 8 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Lin-Manuel Miranda News Part 1: In The Heights finally makes the trip from Broadway to Hollywood

Media Twitter: TikTok, ViacomCBS, Libel, and Marie Colvin

Just a quick round up of what’s been of interest to me on Twitter this week.


TikTok, the Chinese owned video sharing app, has had a range of controversies surrounding it.  The most recent is that the company was suppressing videos from LGBTQ, disabled and overweight creators supposedly to keep them from being bullied.


So, after years of talk, it’s happened – the new name is officially ViacomCBS.


Sometimes Devin Nunes is suing a make-believe cow on Twitter, and sometimes he actually files a libel suit that is not silly on its face. But he sure does like filing libel suits.


And just a quick look back at war correspondent Marie Colvin, whom I’ve been talking about in class this week.

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 13, Chapter 3, Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Media Twitter: TikTok, ViacomCBS, Libel, and Marie Colvin