2019 in Media – When the chicken sandwich wars go viral

In retrospect, we all should have seen it coming.

We should have guessed that one of the biggest social media battles of the year would be a corporate fight over … chicken sandwiches.

The Chick-fil-A chicken sandwich empire has long had connections to social conservatism.  And while the company founder’s connection to evangelical causes and “closed on Sunday” business model has brought it criticism, those same factors have made it a  favorite on the political and religious  right. (Along with all the people who simply like their sandwiches.)

On my own college campus, there was a bit of a dust up nearly four years ago when conservative activist news sites made a huge deal out of the restaurant being “banned” from the University of Nebraska Student Union.  Nothing of the sort happened, of course; there was simply a discussion going on as to what fast food restaurant Lopers wanted added to their student union. After all the fuss, Chick-fil-A has a been a popular lunch spot on campus for the last year. (You can get the back story here.)

While there has long been talk about boycotts of the sandwich slinger from progressives, I’ve long believed that the company has benefited more from being the signature fast food for conservatives than from being hurt by critiques from the left. (I would suspect that progressives rarely have favorite large corporations…)

So Chick-fil-A has long been the default winner in the battle of the chicken sandwiches.  Despite massive corporate efforts, McDonalds has not been able to create a break-out chicken product since the ubiquitous Chicken McNuggets went national back in 1983.

Kentucky Fried Chicken has the most stores of mass-market chicken cooks, but they have always been known much more for their bone-in and strips than for their sandwiches. (Note that while there are more KFC stores, Chick-fil-A sells a lot more chicken.)

The  same was true of my personal favorite – Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, until the summer of 2019.

Da. Da. Dum…. (That sounds ominous)

Popeyes, despite having a white founder, has long had soul food sensibilities and has long been built around the concept of spicy chicken. On Aug. 12, 2019, Popeye’s introduced their chicken sandwich, available in both spicy and regular forms, to the world, and the world went crazy, with hours long lines extending out the doors of every restaurant. Chick-fil-A could not let this shot on their bow pass, and so as a proper 21st century company, they tweeted out:

To which Popeye’s responded with a rather cheeky retweet:

Notice the differences in response – Chick-fil-A as of this writing got 23,000 likes, while Popeye’s response go 320,000. It even generated a visit from the Distracted Boyfriend:

The Popeyes sandwich proved to be so popular that before the end of the month, the company had sold out of the product. But the social media battle didn’t really quiet down.  At one point, Popeyes suggested to customers they could bring a bun to the restaurant and place a pair of chicken strips into it.

Popeyes brought the sandwich back to the market on Nov. 3, 2019 – National Sandwich Day, which happened to be on a Sunday (when its rival is closed).

Chick-fil-A had plans for celebrating National Sandwich Day before belatedly realizing what day it was.

In mid-November, Chick-fil-A surprised both supporters and critics by announcing that their charitable foundation was going to change its giving pattern and no longer contribute to a pair of charities that had been perceived as anti-LGBTQ. Much of the response to this change came from the political right who viewed the new policy as a betrayal of the company’s conservative supporters. Typical was the response from former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee:

Other players in the fast food battlefield have tried to rise to relevance through all of this, with McD’s trying for a Chick-fil-A sandwich clone in a pair of markets, received only minimal attention.

Wendy’s sassy Twitter account generated a fair amount of notice a couple of years ago when then 16-year-old Carter Wilkerson got the chain to give him free chicken nuggets for a year when he got a tweet about the crispy product shared more than 3.6 million times, setting a record for Twitter.

An important thing to remember through all of this is that the whole chicken sandwich wars are primarily about telling a story about something that is easy to buy and enjoy. It’s not really about the food. (HINT: If you like chicken sandwiches, you will likely enjoy both Chick-fil-A’s and Popeyes’ offerings.  McD’s? You’re on your own there…)

David Portalatin, a food industry analyst, told The Washington Post, “This whole thing is not about chicken sandwiches. It’s about the virality of the story. And it’s a reflection of the performance of chains like Chick-fil-A.”


And finallya bit of an uplifting story in the battle over fried chicken sandwiches. As the narrative over the Popeyes sandwich was escalating last summer, musician Bri Hall responded by tweeting about the Washington, D.C. restaurant the Roaming Rooster’s chicken sandwich.  Her tweet went viral, bringing in long lines for the restaurant and its four food trucks.  Roaming Rooster, owned by an Ethiopian immigrant, repaid Bri with a promise of free chicken for life.

Posted in Chapter 1, Chapter 10 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 2019 in Media – When the chicken sandwich wars go viral

LMM News Part 2 (sort of): Hamilton, impeachment and the current news cycle

I started tweeting about Alexander Hamilton and impeachment this morning as a way of avoiding working on my end-of-the semester grading, and it kind of got out of control.  Here it is in mildly more coherent form:

Artwork of Alexander Hamilton and President Trump from Pep Montserrat for The Washington Post

Pep Montserrat for The Washington Post

It all started this morning when I was reading the Washington Post’s morning newsletter The Daily 202 that carried the headline “Alexander Hamilton has been cast in a starring role for impeachment’s closing arguments.” (I might also note that it came with a fantastic bit of artwork by Pep Montserrat.) In it, Post journalist James Hohmann writes, using an abundance of references to the Hamilton musical, about how politicians of both the Republican and Democratic persuasion have been using the nation’s first treasury secretary and defender of the constitution to talk about the impeachment of President Trump.

Most of the talk has come Hamilton’s work on the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays written by Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay in defense of the U.S. Constitution.  (If you want to actually see the original text, Congress’s web site has a good on-line version of them.) And while Hamilton (and Madison’s and Jay’s) writings are as germane today as ever, there’s no question that Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton musical is a big part of what we are paying so much attention to the first treasury secretary.

https://youtu.be/o78c23qSR4g

As a side note, Lin-Manuel Miranda, who wrote and starred in the musical Hamilton, told The New York Post (a newspaper co-founded by Hamilton!) that it never occurred to him that his musical would be so big. “I thought it would be popular with teachers, and I hoped it would appeal to hip-hop fans and musical theater fans alike, [but] I never anticipated how it would catch on with people in power, and how often I hear politicians and people who work in DC quoting the show,” Miranda told the NY Post.

Lin-Manuel Miranda performs with the cast of “Hamilton” at the 2016 Tony Awards.

But I think there’s one more reason I can think of for Alexander Hamilton to come to the forefront right now. Hohmann, writing for The Daily 202, said that Hamilton never got to be president because he was killed in a duel. While that is certainly true, Hamilton’s political career was over much earlier for a range of reasons.

Among the reasons Hamilton was never president was because he paid hush money to cover an affair he had with Mariah Reynolds. When his political enemies found out about the payments, they initially assumed they had to do with evidence of improper currency speculation. Hamilton responded by publishing  The Reynold’s Pamphlet — an exhaustive documentation of his affair and subsequent blackmail payments. That pamphlet, I think, is one of the reasons he never became president. (That and the so-called Adams Pamphlet that attacked President John Adams from his own party.)

Anyway, James Hohmann has a great news commentary in the Washington Post today, but keep in mind the rest of the story.

And finally… when people say that political times have never been this bad before, just remember there was a time when the sitting vice president gunned down the former treasury secretary in a duel.  So far we don’t have that happening… Yet, anyway.

The duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton at Weedhawken, N.J.

Posted in Chapter 6, Chapter 7 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on LMM News Part 2 (sort of): Hamilton, impeachment and the current news cycle

Lin-Manuel Miranda News Part 1: In The Heights finally makes the trip from Broadway to Hollywood

(UPDATE: 5/12/20 – The release of film adaptation of In The Heights has been delayed until the summer of 2021 because movie theaters have been closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Though I wouldn’t be shocked if it ended up landing on Disney+ before then…) 

Before Lin-Manuel Miranda became a household name for writing and starring in the hit musical Hamilton, before he was nominated for an Oscar for music from the Pixar movie Moana, before he was a supporting character in the movie Mary Poppins Returns or the HBO series His Dark Materials… 

Before all these things, Lin-Manuel Miranda wrote and starred in a  hip hop/Latin musical called In The Heights based on the New York neighborhood he grew up in – Washington Heights.

The show was a big hit, running on Broadway from 2008 – 2011 and winning four Tony awards, including Best Musical.

Lin-Manuel Miranda and the Broadway cast of In The Heights from the 2008 Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.

The development of a movie version of In The Heights seemed inevitable, especially with the subsequent phenomenal popularity of Hamilton. But there was a holdup because the film rights were held by the Weinstein Co., which was driven into bankruptcy by the numerous sexual harassment allegations and criminal charges against movie producer Harvey Weinstein. But when the bankrupt studio failed to put Heights into production by 2017, the rights reverted to Miranda and the show’s playwright Quiara Alegría Hudes. Warner Bros. reportedly paid $50 million for the rights to the play.

The movie, directed by Crazy Rich Asians Jon M. Chu, is slated for release in the summer of 2020, and the trailer for it just dropped earlier this week. And I could not be more excited about a new movie musical.

Here’s the trailer:

And finally:

Here’s a BroadwayCon panel from 2018 on In The Heights

Part 1

Part 2

Posted in Chapter 8 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Lin-Manuel Miranda News Part 1: In The Heights finally makes the trip from Broadway to Hollywood

Media Twitter: TikTok, ViacomCBS, Libel, and Marie Colvin

Just a quick round up of what’s been of interest to me on Twitter this week.


TikTok, the Chinese owned video sharing app, has had a range of controversies surrounding it.  The most recent is that the company was suppressing videos from LGBTQ, disabled and overweight creators supposedly to keep them from being bullied.


So, after years of talk, it’s happened – the new name is officially ViacomCBS.


Sometimes Devin Nunes is suing a make-believe cow on Twitter, and sometimes he actually files a libel suit that is not silly on its face. But he sure does like filing libel suits.


And just a quick look back at war correspondent Marie Colvin, whom I’ve been talking about in class this week.

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 13, Chapter 3, Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Media Twitter: TikTok, ViacomCBS, Libel, and Marie Colvin

Why You Should Be Reading the Wall Street Journal: Google & TikTok Edition

I know, I know, the WSJ is behind a pretty solid paywall.  You really do have to pay to read it. And I know it’s owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. And some of you may be bothered that it has a really strong right-leaning editorial page.

All that changes nothing.

They have some of the best reporting going on in an era where there is a lot of good newspaper reporting going on:

Forget about all the “GOOGLE’S SO BIASED” nonsense and see how Google is shaping search

Surprise, surprise, the shaping is not done so much to match political goals as it is business goals.  A long read, but worth it.  And great example of use of graphics in online stories. And a great example of why the most vocal complaints about a media company may not correspond to what their real faults are.


How did a Goofy Music Selfie Site Become the Chinese Boogie Man of Social Media?


How To Get Past That Darn Paywall

  • Buy a subscription (sorry, membership).
  • Some pretty reasonable rates for faculty and students.

 

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Why You Should Be Reading the Wall Street Journal: Google & TikTok Edition

World Diabetes Day – The Story of Three Diabetics

The one thing you need to know about me as I tell this story is that I’m an insulin-dependent diabetic and have been for a decade and a half.  My pancreas checked out years ago and no longer does much.  Which means that I have to manually control how much insulin I take in so I can process the carbohydrates I eat too much of.

Today is World Diabetes Day in honor of Frederick Banting, and his team of scientists, who isolated insulin in 1922 and gave none-insulin producing diabetics a chance at life.  The following post is based on a presentation I gave to the Kearney, NE, Torch Club in May of this year.


If you have a normal, functional pancreas, it will produce the right amount of insulin to process the carbs you have just eaten whether you have eaten a salad, a slice of birthday cake, drunk a Coke, eaten French fries or an order of drunken noodles. Not just sugar – all carbs, which the body eventually breaks down into sugar.

If you are diabetic, you either do not produce sufficient insulin, you cannot process the insulin or both. This leads to a toxic buildup of sugar in your bloodstream that eventually spills over into your urine.

Diabetes is an auto-immune disease that often, but not always, has a genetic component.  It is generally described as having two forms:

  • Type 1 or juvenile. The body rather suddenly stops producing insulin. This often afflicts children who have recently had a case of the flu or other viral infection. A few weeks later, the young person will start dropping weight, having an insatiable thirst, having to pee constantly, and suffering changes in vision. Were you to taste their urine, it would be sweet. (And yes, that used to be a diagnostic technique for diabetes – tasting the patient’s urine.) Treatment today is injection or infusion of insulin along with monitoring diet.
  • Type 2, or adult onset, is characterized by insulin resistance. That is, the body can no longer efficiently process insulin.  It is also possible that the pancreas will become stressed and gradually make less and less insulin. This will typically attack the patient gradually, and only in retrospect will the patient realize what is going wrong.  This is my story. Treatment starts with diet, exercise and medication to lower insulin resistance.  It may eventually require insulin to treat.

But then there is also… Gestational diabetes that can affect women when they are pregnant. Sometimes it goes away after delivery. Sometimes it doesn’t. It’s a form of insulin resistance brought on by placental hormones. And there is LADA – Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults. It presents like Type 2 but then progresses over months or years to be more like Type 1. It can afflict thin, athletic adults as well as the overweight. My younger sister clearly has this form.  I was once told by a diabetic researcher that there aren’t two types of diabetes, there are literally hundreds.  Or, as they say in the diabetic community – YDMV (Your Diabetes May Vary).

In the rest of this blog post, I’m going to tell you the story of three diabetics and how access to (or lack thereof) to insulin changed their lives. I will reference my sources as we go through these stories.

It is possible I will have unattributed direct quotes here. These was originally written to be spoken, not read in print.


Elizabeth Hughes – The discovery of insulin brings new life to diabetics

Elizabeth Hughes as a child.

Elizabeth Hughes was the daughter of Charles Evan Hughes and Antoinette Carter Hughes.  Hughes was an important man in turn-of-the-century United States, having served as an associate justice of the US Supreme Court; he stepped down to run for office as a Republican, and then was later reappointed to the court as the chief justice. He had been governor of New York, ran against Woodrow Wilson for the presidency, and was secretary of state. (This section is drawn from Breakthrough: Elizabeth Hughes, the Discovery of Insulin, and the Making of a Medical Miracle. By Thea Cooper and Arthur Ainsberg. St. Martins Press 2010

She was a normal, if precocious and somewhat small child.  Like her father, she had a photographic memory. She loved playing in Central Park in NYC, which she considered her back yard. until age 11 in 1918, when she became a classic Type 1 diabetic. In the fall of that year, she came down with the flu. By March of the following year, she had a “unusually ravenous appetite and an unslakeable thirst.”

Given that her parents had every possible resource and privilege they could bring to bear to help their afflicted daughter, they sought treatment in 1919 from the doctor who had  the best luck caring for diabetes – Dr. Frederick Allen.  When the Hughes met with Dr. Allen, he did not have good news for them. (And he was generally a difficult man.  He was severe and serious.  Not a warm caring individual.)

He was going to have to tell this family that their daughter would likely be dead within a year.

Her mother pleaded – hoping for a miracle.

There would be no miracle, but there was one possible treatment – starvation.

A normal child Elizabeth’s age consumes about 2,200 calories a day.  Dr. Allen would propose a diet for her starting with a fast and then going up to 400 calories a day, none of which would be carbohydrates.

Everything she ate would need to be weighed.

Her mother asked how long she would need to stay on this diet to be cured.

There would be no cure, she was told, only a lifetime of nearly starving to death.  This stringent diet might give her 18 months to live.

In order to manage this diet, Elizabeth would have to move into Dr. Allen’s sanatorium.

Children on a diabetes starvation diet from before insulin was available.

The consequence of this treatment is that the patients would start looking like someone who had been imprisoned in a concentration camp or have been the victim of a famine.

Fortunately for Elizabeth, she would not need to stay on this cruel balance between dying of diabetes and starvation for too long.  Because in 1921 and 22, doctors and researchers working in Toronto were closing in on the hormone (or pancreatic extract) that would eventually be identified as insulin and would if not cure diabetes, at least serve as a treatment.

The discovery of insulin could be it’s own blog post, but the more I dug into it, the less I wanted to talk about it. Let’s do the Cliff Notes version – multiple scientists and doctors around the world were working on the problem of treating diabetes. Everyone knew it had something to do with the pancreas, because if you gave a dog a panceactomy, the dog immediately became diabetic and died soon after. (This section is drawn from The Discovery of Insulin 25th Anniversary Edition, Michael Bliss. 1982, 2007, University of Chicago Press.)

By my best understanding, insulin was developed as a clinical product by a team of four people who often did not get along – a young doctor named Frederick Banting; a master’s student, Charles Best;  a University of Toronto professor J.J.R. Macleod, and a medical researcher named J.B. Collip. Macleod and Banting would share the Nobel Prie for medicine for their work, and each of them would share their prize money with one of the other team members.

It was a challenge because the researchers did not know which of part of the pancreas was responsible. The research involved surgery on and experiments with many, many dogs, a number of rabbits, and even human beings.  Banting was willing to test his pancreatic extract on patients, likely earlier than wise, because without insulin, the patient would soon die.  When you knew your patients had a 100 percent chance of dying without treatment, such ethical decisions became easier.

Once insulin was isolated, our band of Canadian researchers thought that they were almost there.  But not so fast – it turns out that manufacturing insulin in quantity turned out the be much more difficult than making it in the lab.

The basic process involved taking animal pancreases, mashing them up (ground sweetbreads) rinsing in a bath of either chilled alcohol or acetone, centrifuge the various solids to separate, further refine with dissolving in alcohol which must then be distilled off. But remember, insulin is sensitive to heat, so you can’t just boil off the alcohol or acetone.

Along with the difficulties in refining large quantities of insulin, there were fights over who would control the new medication. Some members of the team were reluctant to enter into a partnership with drug maker Eli Lilly because they wanted the drug to be freely available to everyone.  Eventually, however, they did have to partner with Lilly.

So it is now spring of 1922.  Elizabeth has been on the starvation diet for more than a year. Banting, one of the central scientists/doctor developing the new drug, is having to drink himself into oblivion every night in order to be able to sleep.  The team is threatening to fall apart.

Most of the small amount of insulin being produced is going to Banting and his clinic.  . An additional member of the team, Dr. Joe Gilchrist, who is a diabetic, tests each new batch of insulin on himself to help establish the strength of it. And word is starting to get out that there is actually a real treatment for diabetes. Doctors are coming and begging for vials of the life-saving extract.

By the spring of 1922, Elizabeth was 14-years-old, five feet tall, and weighed between 52 and 54 pounds. She was down to consuming 300 calories a day.  Her mother found out about the discovery of insulin in Toronto, and wanted to get it for her daughter.

In August of 22, Dr. Allen visited Dr. Banting in Toronto When he came back to New York, he told his patients – “I think I have something for you.” Chief among these patients was Elizabeth.  Allen took the tiny girl to Toronto for treatment directly from Banting. She was down to 45 pounds.

Elizabeth started getting two injections a day of insulin.  Her diet gradually built up to 1,200 calories and then to a normal 2,200. She wrote to her mother:

“To think that I’ll be leading a normal, healthy existence is beyond all comprehension. Oh, it is simply too wonderful for words this stuff. Isn’t that unspeakably wonderful?”

There were still problems.  The strength of the insulin was not reliable, which could lead to hypoglycemic (extreme low blood sugar) reactions, which have the potential to be deadly. She always covered with sores at injection sites.

But by the fall of 1922, Elizabeth was just one of several hundred patients being treated with insulin in North America.

Elizabeth Hughes graduated from Barnard College in 1929 and in 1930 married William T. Gossett. As an adult, she told no one of what she went through. Even her fiancé did not know until after they were engaged.

In 1980, historian Michael Bliss succeeded in tracking her down and interviewing her.  In 1981 she died after suffering a heart attack.  She had lived with diabetes for 60 years. When she had been diagnosed, her life span was expected to be at best months.


Eva Saxl – What do you do when war cuts off your source of insulin for years at a time?

Just because insulin is known and exists doesn’t mean it is always available.

Take the amazing story of Eva Sax.

(This material is largely drawn from Cheating Destiny: Living with Diabetes, America’s Biggest Epidemic, James S. Hirsch, 2006, Houghton Mifflin Co.)

Eva was born in Prague, Czechoslovakia in 1921, essentially at the birth of insulin.  Her family was Jewish (so you can see where this is going…)

Eva and Victor Saxl

She had poor vision, so her parents had her tutored at home and she eventually spoke eight different languages.  In 1940 she married a distant relative, textile engineer Victor Saxl.  That year was a good one for Jewish people to get out of Czechoslovakia.

She and Victor, in the midst of a global depression, had a hard time finding anyplace to move to, but eventually made it to “the port of last resort” – Shanghai, China. They moved into a Jewish ghetto with about 18,000 more refugees.

This was not a particularly safe place to be. It was occupied by Japanese troops, and at one point troops showed up at her school and started shooting teachers.  Fortunately for Eva, she passed out before she was shot and was left for dead.

Soon after she started losing weight and craving water (we know where this is going), and she was diagnosed with diabetes. To begin with, this was not a problem.  She took injections twice a day with Lilly insulin.

But following the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Japanese grip on Shanghai tightened, and Eva had to go on a modified starvation diet and start rationing her insulin. There was also the problem of getting glass syringes for injections along with needles.

With no long-term hope of being able to buy insulin (not even with 1-oz. gold bars), her husband Victor decided to try to make it for her. None of the doctors were willing to help.  They were afraid they would make a bad batch of insulin and accidentally kill Eva. (Not an unreasonable fear. ) But the doctors would loan him their medical books (in six different languages which the two linguists could easily handle)

Victor then found a small lab where a Chinese food chemist worked.  The chemist agreed to let Victor use his lab and to help him. Thus became the group project of making homemade insulin.

Eva and their cook would go to the nearby slaughterhouse to get water buffalo and pig pancreases.  She would take the organs home in an open mouth thermos.

They would then grind the meat using her mother’s old meat grinder.  The organs then went through refinement with alcohol, ice, and a centrifuge.  Ice and alcohol came from diabetics outside of the ghetto.

Victor tested the strength of his homebrew on rabbits, trying to establish what the strength of the insulin was.  Eventually, with Eva’s supply of insulin running short, Victor was ready to try a vial of brownish insulin on his wife.   He lied to her, telling her it was Japanese insulin made from fish.  Eva knew he was lying, but played along and said “Yes, let’s try the fishy stuff now.”

Amazingly the insulin worked (and didn’t kill her!). They quickly gave it to two patients who were in a diabetic coma at the hospital, and they quickly came around. The diabetics in the ghetto soon started using the new insulin. Some paid with money to help buy new supplies, some provided ice or alcohol. One provided a needle sharpener.  Mr. Wong, the food scientist, never took any payment for his help other than some home-knitted wool sox.

In the end, none of the users of Victor’s insulin died from the homemade medication.

Eva and Victor remained outspoken advocates for diabetics and even met with President Truman.  They also met with insulin developer Charles Best.

In 2004 diabetes writer James Hirsch tracked her down in Chile and they talked on the phone. She died not long after at the age 0f 83.


Alec Raeshawn Smith – Death from a lack of insulin in what should be the age of plenty

In the 1980s, Eli Lilly was the first company to manufacture insulin using genetically modified organisms – essentially bacteria that had been genetically edited to produce insulin as a byproduct of their metabolism. (Or as I so eloquently put it, they poop out insulin…) The process of manufacturing GMO insulin is now a decades-long established business and there is no shortage in industrialized countries of highly effective insulin. But that doesn’t mean that diabetics always have access to it.

(This material is largely drawn from “Insulin’s High Cost Leads to Lethal Rationing,” Bram Sable-Smith. NPR, 9/1/18.)

Photo of Alec Smith held by his mother, Nicole Smith-Holt. Photo by Bram Sable-Smith for NPR

Alec Raeshawn Smith was diabetic. In the spring of 2017, he was turning 26 years old and would have to go off his mother’s health insurance.  Without insurance, his insulin and supplies could cost as much as $1,300 a month.

He made $35,000 a year as a restaurant manager.  Too much to qualify for Medicaid or subsidies in the Minnesota health insurance marketplace.  His plan had a $450 monthly premium and an annual deductible of $7,600.

He decided he couldn’t afford the insurance and decided to go without.

He died less than a month of going off his mother’s insurance, trying to ration the insulin he had to last until his next payday when he could afford to buy more.

There actually were possibilities for him.  Walmart’s pharmacy had a kind of old-fashioned insulin that he likely could have afforded (though it works slowly and is prone to causing lows), but he didn’t live long enough to talk to his doctor about it.

The price of insulin has risen substantially in recent years with retail being more than $250 a vial (I use a little more than 2 vials a month.) And the more convenient pens cost more than the vials.

Top of the line treatment like I get, with a continuous glucose monitor and an insulin pump gets really expensive.  I’m blessed with good insurance.  But my younger sister, who until recently was self-employed and has a high deductible policy, is able to afford her supplies because she’s part of a study.


There is starting to be progress now on making insulin more readily available to those who don’t have top-of-the line health insurance, but there are still way too many barriers for diabetics who are having trouble affording insulin.

If I did not have access to significant quantities of insulin daily, I would be sick within hours and could be dead in days or weeks.

We live in a land of plenty. It is inexcusable that nearly 100 years after the discovery of insulin we still have people dying here because they don’t have access to it.

Dr. Banting and the other scientists who first isolated insulin sold their patent to Eli Lilly for $1 so that this life-saving drug could be as inexpensive as possible.  It has been decades since there have been significant improvements to the insulin production process.  There is no excuse beyond corporate greed for the economic barriers that keep patients away from insulin.

Posted in Diabetes | Tagged , , | Comments Off on World Diabetes Day – The Story of Three Diabetics

Media Twitter: Esports, video games, and the story behind TikTok

Esports making the move into high schools:


Call of Duty’s dark view of Russia is having global consequences for the video game:


TikTok is supposedly the new Vine.  But there’s a lot of questions about the Chinese-owned social media video channel. Excellent reporting from Michael Socolow and some articles by others he’s shared:

Posted in Chapter 10 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Media Twitter: Esports, video games, and the story behind TikTok

Guest Blog Post: Deadspin – When Vulture Capitalists Don’t Like What They’ve Bought

Readers who turned to the irreverent and unpredictable sports, news and pop culture blog Deadspin on Thursday morning, hoping to get the eclectic blog’s take on the National’s win of the World Series were disappointed to see only a story about Jordanian soccer. (Not that there’s anything wrong with Jordanian soccer, mind you.) 

Why was this? The site’s new venture capitalist owners had fired the blog’s editor in chief for refusing to obey an order to limit their coverage to just sports.  This firing was followed rapidly by at least eight Deadspin journalists resigning, putting the future in doubt for the popular site.

The following guest blog post originally appeared on Shannon McRae’s Facebook page.  It is reprinted here by persmisson.

It’s not that I always loved Splinter. Sometimes the political takes could be painfully annoying and restricted in perspective. But sometimes it was brilliant, so I checked it every morning, before breakfast. Now it’s gone, the way Gawker is gone, and for far less reason.

These past couple of days, I’ve been watching Deadspin’s highly public implosion. I am the opposite of somebody who cares about sports, except for the comforting ambient sounds of a football game at family gatherings.

But I also checked Deadspin every day: for the sharp political commentary you truly couldn’t get anywhere else, for the pop culture reviews, for the “how to be a 21st-century man” guidance, which was always witty, David Roth’s political analysis, which was always as incisive and crafted as a blade. And dammit, for Jolie Kerr’s cleaning tips, and Albert Burneko‘s excellent recipes, carefully conveyed in bro-speak, so guys could learn to cook. Deadspin was great because it taught other men how to be men in such gentle, remarkable, intelligent ways.

And now it’s gone. The vulture capitalists who acquired them to add to their media portfolio told them to “stick to sports,” and that the main value was in advertising and new traffic–not at all in excellent writing, strong journalism that regularly broke major stories, literally millions of readers, and a solid revenue stream. Most of the writing staff refused to cooperate with executive micromanaging of editorial content, issued blistering criticisms in a highly public fashion (twitter, Daily Beast, CNN, Washington Post, NY TImes, etc. Don’t piss off journalists). Yesterday, most of them quit their jobs.

Destroying the product and making off with the spoils is the new business model, for far too many media companies now. I saw this happen in the tech industry in the 90s (my own brush with deliberate wreckage and corporate-minded micromanaging of online media gave me some insights into this world I’d rather not have had).

I care because I care about public writing, intelligent content, and individual expression. I care because exactly the same thing is happening in academia–forcing us to regard ourselves as content providers, our knowledge as product, and students as consumers. I care because institutions that were never designed to be revenue-generating are now being run like factories–our knowledge and expertise devalued, and our labor regarded as expendable. Since tenured professors are expensive, we are being phased out, replaced by adjuncts paid less than minimum wage–academia as gig economy.

To deprive a society of the type of critical oversight provided by trained journalists, to deprive it of the type of critical thinking and analysis that a liberal arts education provides, in favor of revenue generation as the only model of value, is to destroy that society. Gawker is dead. Splinter and Deadspin were murdered. And now we are that much deeper in our own fatal stupidity.

Dr. Shannon McRae is a professor of English at State University of New York at Fredonia. She teaches English, Film Studies, and popular culture.

Posted in Chapter 10, Guest Blog Post | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Guest Blog Post: Deadspin – When Vulture Capitalists Don’t Like What They’ve Bought

Costumes not to wear on Halloween, no matter who you are.

This should go without saying, but given costumes I have seen over the years, this needs to be said:

These are Halloween costumes no one should wear.  You have been warned.

Sexy Tariffs

Sexy vegan food and/or tater tots

Quite possibly the worst idea ever:

Sexy Where’s Waldo:

Sexy Handmaid’s Tale:

Sexy Ebola Nurse (No, I did not make this one up):

Amazingly Bad Judgment Canadian Politician:

This one will mess with your barely pubescent children’s psyche

Another Bad Idea PBS star costume:

Well, I suppose given that she has a New York Post:


And finally… I’m not generally a fan of online quizzes.  Usually they exist only to collect marketing information about you.  But for this one from NPR I’ll make an exception.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Costumes not to wear on Halloween, no matter who you are.

Travels With Putt Putt: Finishing out the season with a ride to the Ozarks.

Putt Putt, my DR650, is all dressed and ready to go riding.

Last week was fall break at UNK, and so it was one last chance for a multi-day ride before cold weather settles in for the season.

First things first – get the bike ready to go complete with saddlebags, tank panniers, maps, and navigation electronics.

After class on Friday, Oct. 18, I headed out.  Started off with my local friend Mike Konz, picking up some remaining Team Strange’s States of Confusion Grand Tour bonus photos. (Sort of a multi-month, multi-state motorcycle-riding scavenger hunt.)

Minneapolis, KS

Wichita State University

Mike and I arrived in Wichita right about dark, and the only restaurant within easy walking distance of our motel was a Denny’s.  Surprisingly, the chain has gotten significantly better in recent years.  Still not a first or even second choice of a place to eat, but I must admit a fondness for their Slam Burger – sort of breakfast on top of a hamburger.

The next morning Mike was headed home and I was off for Ozark, Missouri to meet up with my old riding friend, Bishop Matthew Riegel.  A planned stop for a bonus in Atlanta, KS got cut off by a missing bridge.

By two that afternoon, Matt and I had met up and made plans for our upcoming days of riding.

The bishop and I at Lord of the Lake Lutheran Church for Sunday services.

On Sunday we rode south through heavy fog on our way to Diamond City, AR, down four-lane highway. We were ok on the divided highway, but I was really nervous about how the fog would be once we turned off onto the twisty state roads. But once we left the main road the fog parted like the Red Sea before Moses.

When we arrived in Diamond City, Matt celebrated mass with the small congregation at Lord of the Lake Lutheran.  Our hosts then took us to the local country club for a delicious buffet lunch.

Our ride back north put us on the Peel Ferry across the reservoir where we soon connected up with MO-95, one of the best motorcycle roads I’ve ever encountered.  Miles of twisties and generally good pavement on our way up to Houston, MO for another States of Confusion bonus.

Matt on the ferry.

Claiming Houston, MO for States of Confusion Grand Tour.

From there it was back to Ozark by way of US-60, not the most exciting road, but it got us back in the barn before full dark.

At 1 a.m. Monday, piercing alarms went off on both our phones, alerting us to the tornado 10 miles north of us in the general area when had been riding on our way to the hotel. Ozark wasn’t hit, but we did have heavy rains and high winds. Catching up on work and the like kept us in town in the morning. In the afternoon, we decided that the aftermath of the storms made the back roads not the most attractive place to go given the level of tree trash likely to be on them. So instead we headed over to a nearby Civil War national battlefield for a fascinating afternoon of history.

Ralph at the visitor’s center for Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield.

A gorgeous afternoon at Wilson’s Creek.

On Tuesday, it was time to head home at first light.  The weather was good, but it was cold out there. Matt was headed back east to West Virginia not long after. Stopped in Nebraska City, NE for one last States of Confusion photo. And then it was time to just focus on getting home.

Late October can an iffy time for a motorcycle trip this far north. The weather was a bit chilly at times, and the winds were more than I would have liked, but what a great trip.  Highly recommend visiting the Ozarks south and east of Ozark, MO.  I will be back.

Spot satellite tracking of my ride. Thanks to Spotwalla for the great map. Click on the map if you want to see more detail (along with a ride I did earlier in the month.

 

 

Posted in Motorcycling | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Travels With Putt Putt: Finishing out the season with a ride to the Ozarks.