Secret 1 – The media are essential components of our lives

Critics often talk about the effects the media have on us as though the media were something separate and distinct from our everyday lives. But conversations with my students have convinced me otherwise. Every semester I poll my students as to what media they have used so far that day, with the day starting at midnight. I run through the list: checking Twitter, Snapchat, or Instagram; listening to the radio; checking the weather on a mobile device; binge-watching Stranger Things on Netflix; reading the latest John Green novel; listening to Spotify on an iPhone; and so it goes.

In fact, media use is likely to be the most universal experience my students will share. Surveys of my students find that more of my morning-class students have consumed media content than have eaten breakfast or showered since the day began at midnight. Are the media an important force in our lives? Absolutely! But the media are more than an outside influence on us. They are a part of our everyday lives.

The stylized yellow ribbon.

Think about how we assign meanings to objects that otherwise would have no meaning at all. Take a simple yellow ribbon twisted in a stylized bow. You’ve seen thousands of these, and most likely you know exactly what they stand for—“Support Our Troops.” But that hasn’t always been the meaning of the symbol.

The yellow ribbon has a long history in American popular culture. It played a role in the rather rude World War II–era marching song “She Wore a Yellow Ribbon.” The ribbon was a symbol of a young woman’s love for a soldier “far, far away,” and the lyrics mention that her father kept a shotgun handy to keep the soldier “far, far away.” The yellow ribbon was also a symbol of love and faithfulness in the John Ford film She Wore a Yellow Ribbon.

She Wore a Yellow Ribbon

In the 1970s, the ribbon became a symbol of remembering the U.S. staff in the Iranian embassy who had been taken hostage. This meaning came from the song “Tie a Yellow Ribbon ’Round the Old Oak Tree,” made popular by the group Tony Orlando and Dawn. The song tells about a prisoner coming home from jail hoping that his girlfriend will remember him. She can prove her love by displaying the yellow ribbon. The prisoner arrives home to find not one but one hundred yellow ribbons tied to the tree. The display of yellow ribbons tied to trees became commonplace in newspaper articles and television news stories about the ongoing hostage crisis after the wife of a hostage started displaying one in her yard.

Tony Orlando and Dawn: Tie A Yellow Ribbon Round The Old Oak Tree


Later, during the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf War, Americans were eager to show their support for the troops fighting overseas, even if they did not necessarily support the war itself, and the stylized ribbon started to become institutionalized as a symbol of support. The yellow “Support Our Troops” ribbon was followed by the red ribbon of AIDS awareness, the pink ribbon of breast cancer awareness, and ribbons of virtually every color for other issues.

And how do we know the meanings of these ribbons? We hear or see them being discussed through our media. The meaning is assigned by the creators of a ribbon, but the success of the ribbon depends on its meaning being shared through the media.

So, do the media create the meanings?

Not really.

But could the meanings be shared nationwide without the media? Absolutely not. The media may not define our lives, but they do help transmit and disseminate shared meanings from one side of the country to the other.

See all of the Seven Secrets About the Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know 2.0

Posted in Chapter 1 | Tagged | Comments Off on Secret 1 – The media are essential components of our lives

The Seven Secrets About The Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know 2.0

Mass Communication: Living in a Media World, 7th Edition

Media literacy is a tricky subject to talk about because few people will admit that they really don’t understand how the media operate and how messages, audiences, channels, and senders interact. After all, since we spend so much time with the media, we must know all about them, right? As an example, most students in an Introduction to Mass Communication class will claim that the media and media messages tend to affect other people far more than themselves. The question of media literacy can also become a political question, for which the answer depends on whether you are a liberal or a conservative, rich or poor, young or old. But the biggest problem in the public discussion of media literacy is that certain routine issues get discussed again and again, while many big questions are left unasked.

The Seven Secrets About the Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know 2.0
Secret 1 The media are essential components of our lives.
Secret 2 There are no mainstream media (MSM).
Secret 3 Everything from the margin moves to the center.
Secret 4 Nothing’s new: Everything that happened in the past will happen again.
Secret 5 All media are social.
Secret 6 Online media are mobile media.
Secret 7 There is no “they.”

Five editions of this book ago, I first came out with the Seven Secrets About the Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know. These were things we don’t typically hear about in the media. Secret things. Perhaps it’s because there is no one out there who can attract an audience by saying these things. Or maybe it’s because the ideas are complicated, and we don’t like complexity from our media. Or maybe it’s because “they” (whoever “they” may be) don’t want us to know them.

But the media world has changed considerably since the secrets were first developed in 2006:

  • Netflix had no streaming service—it was only a DVD-by-mail service.
  • There was no iPhone—the BlackBerry with its little Chiclet keyboard was the height of smartphone technology.
  • There were no tablet computers.
  • Cell phone service was typically sold by the minute, and most mobile plans had a limit to the number of text messages that were included in the basic plan.
  • Google was in the process of buying a cell phone video sharing service called YouTube created by three former PayPal employees.
  • Facebook was only two years old, and use of it was limited to college students.
  • Instagram hadn’t yet gone online—that wouldn’t happen until 2010. By 2018, it had eight hundred million active users.

Today, my students tell me they watch most of their video using Netflix streaming, virtually all of them have a smartphone and several social media accounts, and their most frequent way of going online is with a mobile device. So in the sixth edition, it became clear that it was time to update the Seven Secrets to better match the current media world, so we released the Seven Secrets About the Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know 2.0. These key issues of media literacy—which don’t get the discussion they deserve—provide a foundation for the rest of the chapters in this book. (And just who are “they”? Wait for Secret 7.)

(This post give you links to all seven secrets. Teachers – You may want to bookmark this series of posts. If your students don’t all have their books during the first week of class, these can be a big help in getting class started.)

Posted in Chapter 1 | Tagged | Comments Off on The Seven Secrets About The Media “They” Don’t Want You to Know 2.0

Great Magazine Covers

In this era of declining magazine circulation and budgets, it can be hard to remember that magazine covers were once one of the most powerful cultural memes around. Journalist Matt Haber recently tweeted out a fantastic thread looking at influential magazine covers and the subsequent covers that they influenced – many of which harken back to the golden age of George Lois Esquire covers and to Annie Liebovitz’s often controversial images.

Magazine covers tweeted by Matt Haber

The Vanity Fair Demi Moore pregnant cover shot by photographer Annie Leibovitz is one of the best know and most copied magazine covers of all time. It was praised by some for presenting the the very pregnant Moore as an image of beauty and criticized by others for implying that women were obliged to always be sexy, even just before giving birth. This cover was also one of the first to be covered up in grocery store check out lines so it didn’t offend customers.

 

Matt Haber tweeted magazine covers

The inspiration covers here are all from George Lois’s incredible work as cover art director at Esquire in the 1960s. Even today they stand out.

Matt Haber magazine cover tweets

Matt Haber magazine cover tweets

The image of a naked Yoko Ono clinging to a dressed-in-black John Lennon taken the morning of the day Lennon was assassinated is undoubtedly Annie Leibovitz’s most famous magazine cover.

 

Matt Haber magazine cover tweets

Matt Haber magazine cover tweets

The July 21, 2008, cover of the New Yorker may be my favorite ever. Embracing every conspiracy/fantasy about the Obamas during the 2008 presidential election, it received criticism from both liberals and conservatives alike. Like so many of the best magazine covers, artist Barry Bitt left the interpretation and meaning of it to the viewer.

Matt Haber magazine cover tweets

Both of these covers echo back to the legendary last photo shoot of Marilyn Monroe by Bert Stern.

Posted in Chapter 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Great Magazine Covers

How to Deal with Offensive Speech – SNL 2018 Edition

Pete Davidson and Dan Crenshaw on SNL.

Pete Davidson and Dan Crenshaw on SNL.

So, a week ago, Pete Davidson on Saturday Night Live mocked a political candidate.  Nothing really new here, right? Except that this time he mocked Lt. Commander Dan Crenshaw, who just won a seat in congress from Texas. Crenshaw wears a black eyepatch because he lost his eye in combat, and Davidson poked fun of him, saying he looked like a “hitman in a porno movie.”

Now, we have a lot of room for humor in our country, but making fun of a veteran for a war injury, goes too far for most people, and Davidson faced extensive criticism from both the right and the left.

This is the point where normally people would start calling for Davidson to be fired and for others start to defending him and saying that politicians are fair game for parody. (And to be fair, some of the expected rhetoric happened.)

But instead… people on the left and the right rightly pointed out that injured vets shouldn’t be mocked for their injuries.

And Davidson realized that Crenshaw deserved an apology.

So Crenshaw was invited on as a guest on SNL’s Weekend Update satirical newscast the following week and accepted Davidson’s apology. He then engaged in a sketch that mocked photos of Davidson along with the comic’s highly publicized breakup with singer Ariana Grande.  (Which is absolutely the right SNL thing to do.)

In short, a comedian and a politician managed to demonstrate that a combination of civility combined with a sense of humor could do a better job of solving problems than yelling about each other on cable news and talk radio.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKaakjMVtyE

Posted in Chapter 14, Chapter 9 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on How to Deal with Offensive Speech – SNL 2018 Edition

Guest Blog Post: Aaron’s going to play video games for 24 hours straight (Is that a smart thing to do? Does his mother know?)

Thanks to Aaron Blackman for this guest blog post about his upcoming 24-hour gaming marathon to raise money for Omaha Children’s Hospital. I urge all of you to at least stop by to watch his stream, and if you feel the urge, make a contribution to this great cause. And … thank you, Aaron, for all you’ve written about video games and e-sports for this blog.

Aaron Blackman and his Switch

Aaron Blackman and his Nintendo Switch

Two years ago I was listening to the guys over at Kinda Funny Games talk about their upcoming 24-hour gaming marathon, and I found myself awfully curious. The four former IGN employees had quit their jobs in 2015 and became a massive success on YouTube chatting about video games, movies, tv shows, comics…well, anything. Their 24-hour gaming marathon was to raise money for Extra Life, which in turn supports Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals across the country.

For several weeks, the Kinda Funny members plugged their upcoming marathon in all of their shows and podcasts and encouraged their viewers to run their own fundraising marathons. In October of 2016 I had been livestreaming video games for about five months and this event sounded like a lot of fun. On top of that, it’d be for a great cause, so I signed up on a whim.

After signing up and chatting with my wife about the marathon, she reminded me that she had spent time in a children’s hospital herself when she was three after undergoing surgery for her heart. This was a detail that had sat with me throughout our relationship, but it took a gentle reminder to put two and two together. There was a personal purpose for raising money now, to give back to the kind of place that took such good care of the woman I love.

I set a goal of raising $100 for the Omaha Children’s Hospital that first year. My friends, family members and colleagues truly went above and beyond in supporting the cause, donating $1,015. My mind was blown at the support, and it happened again in 2017 when loved ones once again donated over $1000.

So here we are, two years down the road and another 24-hour marathon approaches. Nerves are starting to set in as I recall drifting off while playing Mario last year. I’m sure that each year will get more and more difficult to pull off an entire day of gaming on my own, but it’s absolutely worth the effort to stay awake and entertain. My Mountain Dew is chilling, my camera and green screen are set, and I’m ready to raise money #ForTheKids.

For anyone interested in donating to the Omaha Children’s Hospital, my donation page is located here: https://www.extra-life.org/participant/blackman.

The 24-hour stream begins Friday November 9 at 10am CST and will be livestreamed at https://www.twitch.tv/flagg05.

 

 

Posted in Chapter 10, Guest Blog Post | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Guest Blog Post: Aaron’s going to play video games for 24 hours straight (Is that a smart thing to do? Does his mother know?)

Questions Worth Asking (Maybe) – Cable News Host Edition

  • What would Fox News do if one of their major hosts directly supported a political candidate?
    Fox News host Sean Hannity spoke as a “special guest” at Trump rally Monday night after having been there originally to conduct an interview with President Trump prior to the event.  According to Politico, Hannity said that he was only at the event for the interview, but didn’t decline the invitation to come on stage.A press release from the people running the event had promo-ed Hannity as a “special guest” prior to the event.  During his appearance, Hannity praised the president, repeated a campaign slogan, and criticized the press attending the event (which included Fox News journalists) as “fake news.”Following the event, Hannity denied his was criticizing his Fox News colleagues. The network’s official statement said,  “FOX News does not condone any talent participating in campaign events. We have an extraordinary team of journalists helming our coverage tonight and we are extremely proud of their work. This was an unfortunate distraction and has been addressed.” How that has been addressed is not yet clear, but to date it does not appear to go beyond a verbal reprimand.
  • What would MSNBC do if one of their major hosts directly supported a political candidate?
    The network would suspend him. This is not a hypothetical.  In 2010, then MSNBC host Keith Olbermann (whom sooner or later gets fired by everyone) made there $2,400 contributions to three Democratic congressional candidates.  Once those contributions were made public by Politico, Olbermann was suspended indefinitely without pay.In a statement, Olbermann pointed out, “I did not privately or publicly encourage anyone else to donate to these campaigns, nor to any others in this election or any previous ones, nor have I previously donated to any political campaign at any level.”  Olbermann eventually left MSNBC in January of 2011.
Posted in Chapter 14, Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Questions Worth Asking (Maybe) – Cable News Host Edition

“A Church, A School –” An editorial from the Atlanta Constitution, 1958

Ralph McGill

For today’s blog post, I’m reprinting a Pulitzer Prize winning editorial by Ralph McGill, written for the Atlanta Constitution almost exactly 60 years ago. As I was researching the links to go with this, the following article from Poynter popped up.  Guess I’m not the only one thinking about Ralph McGill today.

A Church, A School —
By Ralph McGill
October 15,1958
Atlanta Constitution

Dynamite in great quantity Sunday ripped a beautiful temple of worship in Atlanta. It followed hard on the heels of a like destruction of a handsome high school in Clinton, Tennessee.

The same rabid, mad-dog minds were, without question, behind both. They also are the source of previous bombings in Florida, Alabama, and South Carolina. The school house and the church are the targets of diseased, hate-filled minds.

Let us face facts.

This is a harvest. It is the crop of things sown.

It is the harvest of defiance  of courts and the encouragement of citizens to defy law on the parts of many Southern politicians. It will be grimly humorous if certain state attorneys general issue statements of regret. And it will be quite a job for some editors, columnists and commentators, who have been saying that our courts have no jurisdiction and that people should refuse to accept their authority, now to deplore.

It is not possible to preach lawlessness and restrict it.

To be sure, none said go bomb a Jewish temple or a school.

But let it be understood that when leadership in high places in any degree fails to support constituted authority, it opens the gates to all those who wish to take law into their hands.

There will be, to be sure, the customary act of the careful drawing aside of skirts on the part of those in high places.

“How awful, ” they will exclaim. “How terrible. Something must be done.”

But the record stands. The extremists of the citizens’ councils, the political leaders who in terms violent and inflammatory have repudiated their oaths and stood against due process of law have helped unloose this flood of hate and bombing.

This, too, is a harvest of those so-called Christian ministers who have chosen to preach hate instead of compassion. Let them now find pious words and raise their hands in deploring the bombing of a synagogue.

You do not preach and encourage hatred for the Negro and hope to restrict it to that field. It is an old, old story. It is one repeated over and over again in history. When the wolves of hate are loosen one people, then no one is safe.

Hate and lawlessness by those who lead release the yellow rats and encourage the care and neurotic who print and distribute the hate pamphlets, who shrieked that Franklin Roosevelt was a Jew; who denounce the Supreme Court as being Communist and controlled by Jewish influences.

This series of bombings is the harvest, too, of something else.

One of those connected with the bombing telephoned a news service early Sunday morning to say the job would be done. It was to be committed, he said, by the Confederate Underground.

The Confederacy and the men who led it are revered by millions. Its leaders returned to the Union and urged that the future be committed to building a stronger America. This was particularly true of General Robert E. Lee. Time after time he urged his students at Washington University to forget the War Between the States and help build a greater and stronger union.

But for too many years now we have seen the Confederate flag and the emotions of that Great War become the property of men not fit to tie the shoes of those who fought for it. Some of these have been merely childish and immature. Others have perverted and commercialized the flag by making the Stars and Bars, and the Confederacy itself, a symbol of hate and bombings.

For a long time now it has been needful for all Americans to stand up and be counted on the side of law and due process of law even when to do so goes against personal beliefs and emotions. It is late. But there is yet time.

 

Posted in Chapter 6 | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on “A Church, A School –” An editorial from the Atlanta Constitution, 1958

Reading and Writing About Food

My senior reporting class this semester has been inspired by the work of the late food writers Jonathan Gold and Anthony Bourdain, and are working on stories about food and culture in the Kearney, Nebraska area.  One of their class-participation assignments involved them finding an article from an outside source that dealt with a topic related to something they were covering. 

They came up with a collection of articles, so I thought I would share them here:

Posted in Chapter 6 | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Reading and Writing About Food

The Many Faces of the Distracted Boyfriend Meme

The Original Distracted Boyfriend Photo

iStock photo from Getty Images – Disloyal man with his girlfriend looking at another girl, photo by Antonio Guillem

You all know this photo, right? It’s the image from the Distracted Boyfriend meme that you’ve seen used a 1,000 different ways.  The image was made by Spanish photographer Antonio Guillem in 2015 as a stock photo that could be licensed from iStock photo for as little as $12.

Guillem told photo blog PetaPixel:

“The setting was completely improvised as we didn’t have time to search for it. As I always work with the same models, it was quite easy to create the situation even though it was quite challenging to achieve face expressions that were believable. Mainly, because we always have a really great work atmosphere and almost all the time one of the models was laughing while we were trying to take the picture.”

Guillem has been pretty good natured about the widespread unlicensed use of his photo:

“All our images are subject to copyright laws and the license agreements of the microstock agencies.

It’s not allowed to use any image without purchasing the proper license in any possible way, so each one of the people that use the images without the license are doing it illegally.

This is not the thing that really worries us, as they are just a group of people doing it in good faith, and we are not going to take any action, except for the extreme cases in which this good faith doesn’t exist.

What really worries us and we are not going to allow it, taking the appropriate legal measures, is the use of the images in a pejorative, offensive or any way that can harm the models or me.”

(It might be noted that the memes based on his photo distributed in the United States are probably not illegal as they would likely be considered parody under the fair use provisions of American copyright law.)

The original photo had the irresistible title of “Disloyal man with his girlfriend looking at another girl.” It’s first use as a meme was reportedly a slam on former Genesis drummer Phil Collins by a Turkish prog rock Facebook page:

Pop, Phil Collins, Prog

Case zero of the Distracted Boyfriend meme.

But the meme didn’t really take off until this variant of the meme exploded in August of 2017.

For the last year, the Distracted Boyfriend seems to have been everywhere:

It has even been used as a grammar lesson by publishing giant Penguin Random House:

Or as an expression of journalistic frustration:

But what brought this meme to mind this morning was a brilliant revival of the Distracted Boyfriend from legal issue blogger Ken White, who operates on Twitter under the handle @Popehat. I really liked his characterization of both major political parties heading into next month’s midterm election:

and

Add your favorite Distracted Boyfriend meme in the comments. (Just keep it reasonably clean…)

 

 

 

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 13 | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Many Faces of the Distracted Boyfriend Meme

Questions Worth Asking (Maybe)

Posted in Chapter 10, Chapter 6, Chapter 7, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Questions Worth Asking (Maybe)